| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| War in Afghanistan Is Winnable, General Says |
| 2009-06-03 |
| The Obama administration's nominee to run the war in Afghanistan said the conflict was winnable, but acknowledged that American casualties will rise in coming months as the U.S. pushes deeper into Taliban-held parts of the country. Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal told the Senate's Armed Services Committee on Tuesday that the 21,000 American reinforcements currently streaming into Afghanistan faced a hard fight and might need two years to achieve measurable progress. "Success will not be quick or easy," he said. "Casualties will likely increase." If confirmed, Gen. McChrystal will need to find ways of avoiding incidents like the U.S. air strikes in Farah Province that killed dozens of Afghan civilians. U.S. officials have rejected Afghan claims that at least 140 Afghans died in the strikes and pegged the civilian death toll at less than 30. But a senior defense official said Tuesday that the continuing investigation into the incident had identified "several potential violations" of the military guidelines designed to minimize civilian casualties. The official said at least two of the strikes should probably have been called off because they didn't involve situations posing imminent risks to American personnel. Gen. McChrystal said U.S. forces would only use airstrikes if the lives of U.S., North Atlantic Treaty Organization or Afghan personnel were at risk. Gen. McChrystal, a veteran of the military's secretive special-operations community, was picked for the job last month after Defense Secretary Robert Gates dismissed Gen. David McKiernan as the top commander in Afghanistan. At the hearing, Gen. McChrystal said the U.S. needed to shift its focus from killing Taliban fighters to better protecting the Afghan population. The goal would be to make the armed Islamist group "irrelevant," rather than defeating it militarily. Gen. McChrystal is expected to win confirmation, but several lawmakers pressed him about the use of harsh interrogation tactics by special-operations forces under his command. The commander said he was uncomfortable with such techniques and worked to minimize their use. |
| Posted by:Beavis |
| #2 It is the worst place in the world to be the government, and the easiest to fight against the government. You make it sound like the best possible terrain for terrorist groups. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2009-06-03 16:10 |
| #1 I hold far fewer hopes. Afghanistan currently has an army of about 80,000. Most experts say that just to maintain some degree of relatively stability without serious external pressure, would require over 200,000. To make matters worse, the vast majority of soldiers are illiterate, and culturally hard to train on top of that. A great deal of their inherited knowledge has been wiped out as well. Then, having half their country bordered by Pakistan, with overlapping Pushtun tribes on both sides, *and* widespread poppy growing Even their own geography works against them, the lowlands being the easiest thing in the world to capture and police, and the highlands near impenetrable. It is the worst place in the world to be the government, and the easiest to fight against the government. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2009-06-03 11:08 |