You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
USSC: Ashcroft, Mueller Cannot Be Sued for Abuse
2009-05-19
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court decides that top officials, including former Attorney General John Ashcroft and current FBI Director Robert Mueller, cannot be sued for their official actions in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The opinion, authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy and joined by the court's conservative justices, upholds long-standing immunity protections given to government officers for their official duties.
The mills of justice grind fine, but they grind exceeding slow.
Change one vote and our public officials making the tough decisions are criminals.
The case focused on the FBI's round-up of mostly Muslim men in the weeks following the Sept. 11 attacks. One of those men, Javaid Iqbal, sued former Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI Director Robert Mueller and two dozen other government workers he claimed were responsible for his arrest.

Iqbal, a Pakistani Muslim, claimed the FBI policy was so targeted toward Muslim men that it was discriminatory.
On NPR today they talked about his claim of being discriminated against because he was a Muslim and an Arab. Don't know if the mistake is Iqbal's or the NPR reporter's.
Iqbal spent nearly six months in solitary confinement in New York in 2002. Iqbal pleaded guilty to conspiracy and fraud for using a stolen social security number, and was eventually deported to his native Pakistan. He had argued that while Ashcroft and Mueller did not single him out for mistreatment, they were responsible for a policy of confining detainees in highly restrictive conditions because of their religious beliefs or race.

Monday's ruling rejects that argument and says that Iqbal lacked the evidence necessary to cross the high threshold required to hold government officials personally liable for their official acts. "On the facts," Justice Kennedy wrote, "...the arrests Mueller oversaw were likely lawful and justified by his nondiscriminatory intent to detain aliens who were illegally present in the United States and had potential connections to those who committed terrorist acts."

The court on Monday overturned a lower court decision that let Iqbal's lawsuit against the high-ranking officials proceed.
Posted by:trailing wife

#5  Don't worry, The One will set all this right.
Posted by: Obamaton   2009-05-19 19:29  

#4  We need to find out who the oldest conservative on the court is and set up a relay of prayers for him...
Posted by: Jonathan   2009-05-19 14:35  

#3  I need to read the minority opinion, because I can't for the life of me figure out why this was not unanimous. Scary.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-05-19 07:33  

#2  All in all a good day I suppose, but it was a 5 to 4 vote along party lines. The fact that the issue even reached the "Supreme" court is disturbing. The 5 to 4 vote is even less encouraging.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-05-19 07:31  

#1  So Iqbal was in the US illegally and committing crimes that fit the profile of those muslims who just murdered 3000 Americans and he thinks he should have been let go on his merry way? Another muzzie who feels he is entitled to do anything he desires at the expense of the infidels and they have no right to object.
Posted by: ed   2009-05-19 07:10  

00:00