You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
U.S. has plan to secure Pakistan nukes if country falls to Taliban
2009-05-15
I read the headline and thought, "Arrrgh! The NYT is at it again!" But it's FOX ...
The United States has a detailed plan for infiltrating Pakistan and securing its mobile arsenal of nuclear warheads if it appears the country is about to fall under the control of the Taliban, Al Qaeda or other Islamic extremists.
I'll bet we have plans to destroy Iran's nuclear program, too. The issue is the political will to execute those plans.
American intelligence sources say the operation would be conducted by Joint Special Operations Command, the super-secret commando unit headquartered at Fort Bragg, N.C. JSOC is the military's chief terrorists hunting squad and has units now operating in Afghanistan on Pakistan's western border. But a secondary mission is to secure foreign nuclear arsenals -- a role for which JSOC operatives have trained in Nevada.
Ah ha! Now we know the real reason President Obama has a trip planned to Las Vegas!
The mission has taken on added importance in recent months, as Islamic extremists have taken conquered territory close to the capital of Islamabad and could destabilize Pakistan's shaky democracy. "We have plans to secure them ourselves if things get out of hand," said a U.S. intelligence source who has deployed to Afghanistan. "That is a big secondary mission for JSOC in Afghanistan." The source said JSOC has been updating its mission plan for the day President Obama gives the order to infiltrate Pakistan. "Small units could seize them, disable them and then centralize them in a secure location," the source said.
Hmm. This sounds like the team trying to get their commander-in-chief to act, rather than a leak to comfort the concerns of the masses. Or am I just not subtle enough?
What makes the Pakistan mission especially difficult is that the military has its missiles on Soviet-style mobile launchers and rail lines. U.S. intelligence agencies, using satellite photos and communication intercepts, is constantly monitoring their whereabouts. Other warheads are kept in storage. U.S. technical experts have visited Pakistan to advise the government on how to maintain and protect its arsenal. Also, there are rogue elements inside Pakistan's military and intelligence service who could quickly side with the extremists and make JSOC's mission all the more difficult. "It's relatively easy to track rail-mounted ones with satellites," said the intelligence source. "Truck- mounted are more difficult. However, they are all relatively close to the capital in areas that the government firmly controls so we don't have to look too far."

JSOC is made up of three main elements: Army Delta Force, Navy SEALs and a high-tech special intelligence unit known as Task Force Orange. JSOC was instrumental in Iraq in finding and killing Abu Musab Zarqawi, the deadly and most prominent Al Qaeda leader in the Middle East. There is speculation in the intelligence community that a secondary reason for Army Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal being named the next commander in Afghanistan is that he headed JSOC in 2006-08 and is read-in on its contingency missions in Pakistan.

Adm. Michael Mullen, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, this month said that based on the information he has seen Pakistan's nuclear warheads are safe. "I remain comfortable that the nuclear weapons in Pakistan are secure, that the Pakistani leadership and in particular the military is very focused on this," he said. "We the United States have invested fairly significantly over the last three years, to work with them, to improve that security. And we're satisfied, very satisfied with that progress. We will continue to do that. And we all recognize obviously the worst downside of -- with respect to Pakistan is that those nuclear weapons come under the control of terrorists. "
Posted by:ryuge

#12  I have no doubt we have a plan.

Too bad we will not use it for fear of offending someone.

I still say that at the end of the day the Taliban will have the nukes.
Posted by: Kelly   2009-05-15 22:36  

#11  Why don't you post it a third time, AC?

It's not like it's your bandwidth...
Posted by: Pappy   2009-05-15 21:46  

#10  Yeah, Carter had a plan, too....
Posted by: KBK   2009-05-15 21:43  

#9  Time to update an old favorite:

Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-05-15 20:44  

#8  FREEREPUBLIC this AM > ARTICS > REPORT: INDIA SAYS PAKISTAN'S NUCLEAR ARSENAL/WEAPONS COULD ALREADY BE IN THE HANDS OF RADICALISTS; + [May 1st, 09]US GENERAL: PAKISTAN COULD FALL TO THE TALIBAN IN TWO WEEKS???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-05-15 19:15  

#7  Then there's the issue of sympathetic detonation when you bust one on top of another.

Sympathetic detonation == BONUS!
Posted by: Herb Angose1296   2009-05-15 13:08  

#6  Back in the 'old days' when they first deployed the Nike Hercules system [which had both a air defense and surface to surface capability] in Germany the op manual for dealing with a sister site being overrun was to use max ordnance [of which the Secretary neither acknowledged or denied] on it. Let's just say, it wasn't a reenlistment booster. Then there's the issue of sympathetic detonation when you bust one on top of another.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-05-15 11:25  

#5  To not have such a plan would have been criminally irresponsible.

To not have such a plan would not be a first.
Posted by: Excalibur   2009-05-15 08:35  

#4  Hold on now, did anyone really think we didn't have a plan (or two) to grab or disable Pakistan's nukes?

To not have such a plan would have been criminally irresponsible.
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-05-15 08:05  

#3  Time to update an old favorite:

Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-05-15 04:10  

#2  Small units could seize them, disable them and then centralize them in a secure location

Or we could just nuke the nukes. Don't even need to exit the aircraft. Of course, since we don't know *exactly* where the Pak nukes are, we would have to be very thorough in our anti-nuke nuking. Happy coincidence, we have all those warheads that need to be used up before their expiration date.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-05-15 01:20  

#1  DEBKA > PAKISTAN'S NUCLEAR ARSENAL WITHIN REACH OF ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS; + ISRAELI MIL FORUM > CAL THOMAS SOURCE > IRAN: HAMAS [ + Hizzies Hezzies Huzzies in LEBANON] IS OUR DEFENSE/FOREIGN POLICY WING IN ISRAEL [Gaza PA], as ostens due to IRAN not having a strong enuff AIR FORCE to defeat ISRAEL'S???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-05-15 00:59  

00:00