You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
A monstrous experiment
2009-05-11
By Nasir Abbas Mirza

Take a little boy and incarcerate him in a remote madrassa. Keep him far away from the rest of the world and bar any interaction with humanity. Indoctrinate him with a distorted version of a religion and tell him that he does not belong to this world. Teach him about the fanciful world that awaits him in the heaven, and that in order to attain that he has to destroy everything that stands in his way, including his own body.

By the time he is sixteen, the child would have become a drone: an un-manned man. Instead of a lively teenager, we would have a robot in living tissue ready to detonate on remote orders.

At full steam ahead in Pakistan, this is a monstrous experiment in brainwashing and it is on a par with, if not worse than, Nazi GermanyÂ’s eugenics. They did it in the name of science; here, it is being done in the name of God and religion. On a very large scale, this is a hugely successful experiment in which nurture triumphs and nature takes a beating.

Are we really prisoners of our genes? Or are we prisoners of our parents, teachers and societies? From what we are witnessing, genetic influences are secondary to environment.

Behavioural scientists have Nobel Prize-winning research material in Pakistan. Freud, Skinner or Pavlov would have worked nights to study this. Pavlov’s dogs salivated at the sound of a bell; this young man would blow himself up at the sound of a bell — his phone bell. “Give me a child until he is seven, and I will show you the man,” goes the old Jesuit saying.

It may be sinister, the Jesuit saying, but the fact remains that nobody understands the vulnerability of a child’s brain better than priests. On the one hand, witness the vigilance of parents when they let a maulvi sahib into their house to teach the Holy Quran to their children; and, on the other hand, there are parents in the same society who ‘give’ a child to madrassa-running priests not until he is seven, but until he is 14 or 15 or forever.

‘Give’ is a generalisation. Given our attitudes towards birth control, an overabundance of young children is a natural outcome. In population growth, we are not too far behind the 6 percent population growth rate of our role model country, Saudi Arabia. There is an endless supply of young boys for madrassas. There are abducted, orphaned or abandoned young boys. Then there are parents who are too poor to bring up a child. They simply sell or donate their boys for tabligh or jihad or for any other religious duty. The religious pretence converts their dastardly act into a noble deed.

Priestly abuse of children has been going on for as long as there have been priests and children. But never has this been done in such an organised manner as is the case here in Pakistan. This abuse (aside from the pervasive sexual abuse) spells disaster. Just step out of a large city and all you would see around you are hundreds and thousands of little children — from six to thirty-six months old. Until these kids are of an age to observe the ways of their elders, they live and behave like untrained dogs. That’s the real Pakistan and no military or political leader is having sleepless nights over this.

Mismanaging the national security state has kept our governments so busy that social uplift has been low on their priorities. For sixty years we gave all our money for security and today we donÂ’t even have that. Even in a perfect world, our leaders couldnÂ’t have done anything about it. The job at hand is beyond their capabilities. Just take a roll call of our leaders in the last thirty years. They have been such a simple and basic lot that protocol and property left them no time for anything else.

Will this ever change or improve. No, not for another thirty years. ThatÂ’s thirty years after we do the needful: that is, a drastic reduction in the number of children we produce, modern education for all on war-footing basis and to do this, schools and First World-standard teachers. So start counting once all this is in place.

From Zia to Zardari, and all others in between, no one even acknowledged that we have an overpopulation problem. Such is the fear of backlash from religious conservatives.

HereÂ’s the equation: a population that breeds likes rats equals poverty equals despair equals cannon fodder for religious organisations and terrorist networks. Were these children better off working at motor workshops or making carpets? Perhaps the ILO or an NGO can answer this question. They seem awfully quiet on something much worse than child labour.

ThereÂ’s a reason for that: in matters of faith or religious beliefs, no one dare object. All kinds of evil, illegal or inhuman practices can be given sanction if a particular religion or sect proves that it is part of its belief. You could be dying in a hospital but no one would give you a hallucinogenic drug to save your life. But, hey, you can get official approval for the use of cannabis or other hallucinogenic drugs if you prove that use of these substances is part of your religious belief. In 2006, the US Supreme Court did just that.

Our children face a frightening future not because of the Taliban (they are just a handful) but because of the ultra-conservative wave of religion that has swept this country. Remote madrassas may be turning boys into drones but then there are thousands of madrassas spread all over PakistanÂ’s urban centres that are producing millions of neo-drones who may not become suicide bombers but are totally unfit to live in this world. These kids need to be rescued.

Alfred Hitchcock, the great movie director who specialised in frightening people, was once driving in Switzerland when he suddenly pointed out of the car window and said, “That is the most frightening sight I have ever seen.” It was a priest in conversation with a little boy, his hand on the boy’s shoulder.

Hitchcock leaned out of the car window and shouted, “Run, little boy! Run for your life!”

The writer is a freelance columnist
Posted by:john frum

#10  I went to public school and a Protestant church. In both instances, I feel I was educated and encouraged to read all kinds of literature, including the Iliad and the Odyssey and the Bible, for myself. Indoctrination of any kind is dangerous. God gave us brains and can take any and all questions but what we do with the answers is individual, knowing we eventually will have personal accountability. I do agree that radical Islam is greatest danger the world has ever faced, as even Hitler didn't target all of civilization with a mass suicidal hatred willing to take everyone else down with them. This can hardly be equated with other religions.
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091   2009-05-11 20:48  

#9  I went to public school and only learned about Greek and Roman mythology in Literature Class.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2009-05-11 19:21  

#8   Generalized anti-religious bigotry like this is disugusting, no matter the accurate portrayal of the dangers of madrassas.

This is the standard Pak response. If something is wrong in Pak, it is equally wrong somewhere else.
So the RSS in India is equal to the LeT. Madrassa indoctrination is equal to Catholic education.
Posted by: john frum   2009-05-11 17:42  

#7  role model country, Saudi Arabia

Thats the bottom line why Pakistan is in a mess!!!!
Posted by: Paul2   2009-05-11 12:24  

#6  Redneck Jim - I went to Catholic school & learned all about Mars, Jupiter, and Mercury (gr: Hermes) in my Latin class...
Posted by: Adriane   2009-05-11 11:46  

#5  Redneck Jim,
Kids in US high schools don't recognize Europe on a map. Why would you expect them to know about Aries?
Posted by: Frozen Al   2009-05-11 11:17  

#4  Somewhat along the same line, My wife wen to catholic School, I just found out she has no idea of anything about Greek Mythology, hasn't a cluewho Aries, Zeus, Mercury etc were.

Odd, as if the Catholics wanted to be sure there was absolutely no mention of "Other Gods" (Than theirs)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-05-11 09:33  

#3  agree no mo uro. I could write a similar piece about academia churning out zombies who laugh and applaud on cue as our democracy burns and turns into just another corrupt, socialist 8*&^hole? What's the difference?
Posted by: Jumbo Slinerong5015   2009-05-11 09:05  

#2  the money to run these Islamist indoctrination centers comes from our friends, the Saudis.
Posted by: lord garth   2009-05-11 07:35  

#1  Generalized anti-religious bigotry like this is disugusting, no matter the accurate portrayal of the dangers of madrassas.

Pointing out the dysfunction of radical Islam is certainly a topic worth exploring, but using it to conflate all religion with evil is intellectual cowardice and incompetence.

Toss this guy in with other evil idiots like Richard Dawkins, where he belongs.
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-05-11 06:44  

00:00