You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
'Green' lightbulbs poison workers
2009-05-05
Whaddaya know - there's still no such thing as a free lunch....
WHEN British consumers are compelled to buy energy-efficient lightbulbs from 2012, they will save up to 5m tons of carbon dioxide a year from being pumped into the atmosphere. In China, however, a heavy environmental price is being paid for the production of "green" lightbulbs in cost-cutting factories.

Large numbers of Chinese workers have been poisoned by mercury, which forms part of the compact fluorescent lightbulbs. A surge in foreign demand, set off by a European Union directive making these bulbs compulsory within three years, has also led to the reopening of mercury mines that have ruined the environment.

Doctors, regulators, lawyers and courts in China - which supplies two thirds of the compact fluorescent bulbs sold in Britain - are increasingly alert to the potential impacts on public health of an industry that promotes itself as a friend of the earth but depends on highly toxic mercury.

Making the bulbs requires workers to handle mercury in either solid or liquid form because a small amount of the metal is put into each bulb to start the chemical reaction that creates light.
Rest at the link. Anyone think the "elites" in charge will care about Chinese workers? (Anyone think the "elites" in charge care about British workers? Naaahh, me neither.)
Posted by:Barbara Skolaut

#10  I know, how bout we make every vehicle which travels on a government road electric, then stand around and wonder why the grain trucks don't make it to market and the pumps on fire trucks ain't like they used to be. Let's think ahead a couple moves at least; that is fancy golf carts and CFBs might be good for your neighborhood but they won't be worth a shit out here.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-05-05 19:11  

#9  Besides, if they were hands-down better then it wouldn't be mandated.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-05-05 19:08  

#8  Out here, with the power surges, incondescents last longer than CFBs.

And how much pollution goes into shipping those bad boys over to the us, transporting them out the middle of the country. And wouldn't be great if a country had a virtual monopoly on light bulbs and then decided to not sell them. If they are so great how come we don't build them here where pollution is better supervised, or is yellow expendable for green? Personally I don't see the payoff, but then again I'm not selling 'em.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-05-05 19:07  

#7  After we decided to change over, and my wife said she would buy some CFB's next time she went shopping, the next light bulb died. So I took a CFB in it's box,and opened it up to have a look. The brand is " ob", very generic.I see a whole bunch of tightly packed, white tubes. They have changed the configuration, I thinks. Took it over to the bed and shook it out of the box. Out falls- 40 tampons.
Posted by: Grunter   2009-05-05 17:35  

#6  For me, the issue was the pathetic lifespan of the incandescent bulbs. We decided to replace each as it died with a CFB, there are 12 in the apartment and it took less than a year.
Posted by: Grunter   2009-05-05 17:25  

#5  Then again, there is 7 mg of mercury in a CFB. If you use incandescent bulbs instead, the coal burned over their lifetimes (figure 3 bulbs) is about 12 mg.

So I'll take the CFBs, thanks. Our whole house is lit with them.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-05-05 15:39  

#4  This another scare tactic of the media to confuse people into inaction. Burning coal also releases mercury, and worse, into the atmosphere instead of stored in the bulb where they can safely disposed of. CFLs are also 4X more efficient than incandescents. In the US, the amount of coal not burned vs. incandescents actually decreases environmental mercury, even if all the CFLs were broken open.
Posted by: ed   2009-05-05 15:34  

#3  This loss of incandescent light bulbs begins in the US with the outlawing of 100W bulbs in 2012 and all incandescent bulbs by 2014. Already, efforts are being made to get rid of lamps with traditional sockets, so stock up on decades worth of sockets, bulbs and higher current switches.

I will add that mercury destroys aluminum, by cutting through its protective layer of aluminum oxide and not allowing it to reform. When unprotected, aluminum metal is highly unstable, and very rapidly rusts. This is why mercury is usually strictly prohibited aboard aircraft unless under strict control.

Even worse, when a mercury bulb is broken, it creates a hazmat situation, which technically requires an emergency response, even in a private home.

Once again, we have the jackasses on Capital Hill and president W. Bush to thank for this b.s.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-05-05 14:11  

#2  they will save up to 5m tons of carbon dioxide a year

Who wants to bet that the actual number is closer to zero. Any takers?
Posted by: Iblis   2009-05-05 12:08  

#1  Ah, the Law of Unintended Consequences. Much of the US is in a "no release of mercury, not no way, not no how" mode. Hard to see how these bulbs fit in.
Posted by: Spot   2009-05-05 10:13  

00:00