Comments

You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Home Front: Politix

The President Who Hates His Country

2009-05-05

In just the first 100-days of his tenure, Obama's words and actions have demonstrated that he is no friend of the country he leads. This is only a smattering of what happened on his recent three-continent trip abroad and to Mexico:

In France, Obama told his audience that America "has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive" toward Europe.

In Prague, Obama -- in true utopian-kindergarten fashion -- pledged "with conviction" that America will "seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons." In other words, destroy big bad America's ability to defend itself!

In London, Obama made clear that the world's financial wealth was no longer made by those inferior leaders Roosevelt and Churchill, effectively ceding America's leading role in creating and sharing wealth to nations that have never measured up to our country's bountiful generosity or spirit of free-market entrepreneurship.

In Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, Obama sat passively while the Marxist Chavez handed him an American-bashing book and delivered another revile-America speech, while never once rising to defend our country.

In Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, Obama again sat passively while the Marxist Ortega blamed the United States for a century of what he called terroristic U.S. aggression in Central America, again emitting not a whisper of defense on our country's behalf.

In Turkey, Obama said -- incredibly and inaccurately -- that America was not a Christian nation.

And in his recent trip to Mexico, Obama said that the escalating border violence was essentially America's fault.

Posted by:Fred

#12 Rev. Wright's star pupil

Posted by: HammerHead 2009-05-05 19:23

#11 Oderint dum metuant.

Posted by: OldSpook 2009-05-05 16:08

#10 I'm all for that too Redneck Jim. I'd also repeal the law of not being able to assassinate foreign leaders. Wetworks would be added into the mix as well.

"Sorry to hear, Mahmoud. You mean a jet full of Mullahs went down yesterday? That's just horrible. Have you figured out what caused the malfunction?"

*snickering in the background*

Posted by: Andy Ulusoque aka Broadhead6 2009-05-05 15:57

#9 Sorry I'm a maverick here, the problem is we threaten, then when not listened to we threaten some more. It's well proved asking and saying "Please" is a waste of time.

I think we should give one warning and when ignored, blast them to hell, the second time folks will listen, (Maybe not the second, but you get the idea)

I don't want the USA to be loved, we've tried that, I want the world scared shitless, THAT will work.

Take hostages, you're dead, your home and neighborhood are a smoking debris pile.

Kill an American and your nation pays 10 million (Each)to the person's survivors, plus the above smoking hole where the neighborhood was.

No payment and their government suffers a huge hole where their capital used to be.

(Or military base, or dam and power plant etc, whatever hurts the worse)

Nukes are worthless, the world has gotten over their fear, we just won't use them, but normal High Explosives work just fine.

Demount the nukes, remount with either HE or a huge hunk of steel (Penetrator) drop said from orbit and a nuke looks puny.

Any international lawyer trying Hobble the USA legaly or sue for damages, kill and destroy as above. End "Lawfare" once and for all.

Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-05-05 14:43

#8 The President Who Hates His Country?

Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-05-05 12:28

#7 You must follow them back to their wolfsshanze TW and destroy it, and them! This is the only language the jihadis will understand. It is the only language they have ever understood. Until we to that, we're only wrestling in the mud with a swine.

Posted by: Besoeker 2009-05-05 08:29

#6 While we haven't stayed out of the world's trouble spots, really, since dear Tommy Jefferson got into a snit about the Barbary pirates, we did try ignoring the jihadis for a while when President Clinton was running things, Besoeker. I don't think any of us are pleased with how that turned out.

Posted by: trailing wife 2009-05-05 08:22

#5 It's already upon us Broadhead. AFRICOM is becoming more involved in the subsaharan region every month. They'll be using the old Mobile Training Team (MTT) model at first, utilizing contractors. Watch it all unfold.

Posted by: Besoeker 2009-05-05 08:20

#4 Besoeker, I'd be game for that. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the street agitator doesn't have us involved in darfur in the next couple yrs.

Posted by: Broadhead6 2009-05-05 08:12

#3 Well ok, I'll give Barry the benefit of the doubt here. He may be on to something! How about we just pull all of our trouble making military and diplomatic missions back to the States, resign from the worthless tit UN, and mind our own business for 5, 10, 20 years or so. Let the more "civilizaation" go at it at as they will and may the best man win. If they so much as blink at us, instantly zap them from space, napalm or nuke the hell out of them. No "nation building, no international aid or 'fix it' missions, just stay right here and leave them to it.

Posted by: Besoeker 2009-05-05 08:08

#2 When Carter was President, he attacked South Korea's human rights record, without acknowledging the context - a hostile North - of the country's national security concerns. It took public protest to shake Carter. Someday a US President will acknowledge the imperialist nature of Islam and the inherent supremacism of Muslims. But don't hold your breath while waiting.

Posted by: Jans Wittlesbach2039 2009-05-05 06:22

#1 Feel free to not represent ME, Mr President.

Posted by: newc 2009-05-05 02:23

00:00