You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Sri Lanka
Surrender option is still open, says Rajapaksa
2009-05-02
[The Hindu International] Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa on Thursday said the option of surrender was still open for the remaining LTTE cadre taking cover among an estimated 20,000 civilians inside the remaining seven km stretch of the No-Fire Zone (NFZ).

At a function here, Mr. Rajapaksa said: "In the five or six days remaining, we have given the opportunity for the LTTE to lay down their arms and surrender to the armed forces and, even in the name of God, free the civilians held by them. If they have no regard for their own lives they should at least consider the lives of others."

Mr. Rajapaksa said the whole world could now see how the LTTE used tanks to fire at the Tamil people fleeing from them. "Of what need special observers to know this? Why do we need special representatives to study this? This is known the world over." It was a surprise that some members of the international community did not see the writing on the wall.

"I must warn the world that this lack of vision could lead to an international tragedy...Daya Master says that he was carried to safety like a father carrying his child." Some parents embrace troops for saving them from terror. "The world must see and know all this. That is why we call this a humanitarian operation".

"This is not how wars are fought in other countries. We have seen how Iraq was bombed. We have seen how Afghanistan is bombed. It must be made clear that before accusing others, you must have the strength to know what you do yourself."
Posted by:Fred

#4  Plenty of progress Redneck Jim. Amazingly, the SL spokesman have been vindicated to a large extent - as far as military actions and reports indicate.

Seems at this point they're in a siege state, basically waiting for LTTE to sort itself out amongst those who can surrender and those who want.

The interesting fact here being that time is on the government side, given it will resist the standard UN/NGO press releases. It has shown great resolution to do so thus far, through te more difficult stages of this offensive, so there's no reason to stop now.

The most fascinating reactions may be coming from India - both the Tamil states in the south, as well as the silence from the national government. I suspect it is studying the actions here in anticipation of what's ahead for its other neighbors.
Posted by: Phineth the Anonymous8743   2009-05-02 15:07  

#3  Yesterday it was a 9 km stretch, progress has been made.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-05-02 14:56  

#2  Yep. The Norwegians advised that the LTTE could not be eliminated militarily. Said the same thing about the Maoists in Nepal. The Nepalis bought this hook line and sinker. The leftists in India and their NGOs push the same line. The Indian Army had the entire Naxal leadership cornered in the jungle a few years ago and the Indian government pulled their forces back and declared a ceasefire for negotiations (which the Maoists used to escape and rearm).

Now the Lankans have showed everyone that elimination is an option.
Posted by: john frum   2009-05-02 14:45  

#1  ...One begins to get the feeling that the 'special observers' fear that if ONE of their pet 'liberation' movements gets creamed, other nations might get the idea to do the same thing.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2009-05-02 08:48  

00:00