You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
New jet-powered UAV makes debut
2009-04-27

The Avenger — a possible successor to the MQ-9 Reaper in the Air Force unmanned aircraft fleet — made its first three flights in April.

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. designed the Avenger to improve upon the capabilities that have made its Reaper and MQ-1 Predator so effective, said Thomas Cassidy, president of the Air Systems Group for GA-ASI.

At 41 feet long with a 66-foot wingspan, the Avenger is slightly larger than the Reaper. But the real difference is propulsion: the jet-powered Avenger can fly 460 miles per hour, about twice as fast as its turboprop-equipped Reaper.

Just like the Reaper, the Avenger will carry 500-pound bombs with GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions with GPS navigations and laser guidance kits attached. In all, the Avenger can carry 3,000 pounds of weapons and sensors.

This unmanned aircraft is the first outfitted with a weapons bay, which will reduce the Avenger’s radar signature. It also has the flexibility to carry extra fuel tanks or a wide-area surveillance pod inside the bay. “If you hang the weapons from the wings like the Reaper and Predator, then it produces the bumps and corners on the edges that radar bounce off of that reveal the shape and size of the aircraft,” said Philip Coyle, an analyst for the Center for Defense Information.

The Avenger requires a caveat as the possible successor, though, because the Air Force hasnÂ’t yet signed a contract for a next-generation unmanned aircraft.

In a statement, Air Force officials commended General Atomics for building the Avenger. But Capt. Stacy Orlowsky, a service spokeswoman, said it wasn’t a done deal to expect the Avenger to join the Air Force fleet.“If the Air Force establishes new UAS requirements, we anticipate an open competition to select the best material solution,” she said.

This isn’t the first time General Atomics has taken this approach. It developed the Reaper and Predator the same way — not waiting for contracts from any of the services.

Like the Predator and Reaper, the Avenger and its near-stealth capability could create another unending appetite from the services, said Tom Ehrhard, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

General Atomics will build an all-reconnaissance version of the Avenger when the Air Force completes development of a wide-area surveillance pod, Cassidy said.

The service is to install 10 wide-area surveillance sensors under the Reaper starting in 2010. Called Gorgon Stare, the sensors will allow airmen to film a 4-kilometer radius from 12 different angles. But itÂ’s still too early to tell if this would be the pod installed under the Avenger, officials said.

The Avenger is designed to fly 20 continuous hours, or 22 with extra fuel tanks — a few less than the Reaper’s 25-hour flight time. Its operational altitude would be 10,000 feet higher than the Reaper with a ceiling of 60,000 feet.

Commanders have come to value unmanned aircraftÂ’s ability to loiter over targets. The AvengerÂ’s 20- to 22-hour flying time combined with the ability to fly twice as fast as the Reaper will increase that loiter time, depending on how far the target is from the AvengerÂ’s home base, Coyle said.

Cassidy said his company might discover during testing that the Avenger is even faster than 460 mph.“One of the most important capabilities for a UAV is its ability to loiter, so you don’t care how fast it is then, but it does matter how fast it can get there and back,” he said.
Posted by:tu3031

#18  Say...400 mph*20 hours @60000 ft with a self-guided 3000lb weapon? It's a two stage launch platform not subject to ICBM rules.
Posted by: Skidmark   2009-04-27 22:59  

#17  TOT on Iran via Avengers?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-04-27 20:50  

#16  Why not tow the plane up-to altitude like a glider does?

I believe that is where some UAV research is going. Combine with solar arrays on the wings and it will fly (slowly) higher during the day then drift slowly lower at night. Loiter times of weeks or months. Although payload will be small.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-04-27 20:29  

#15  I'd be VERY careful of making sure the Russians don't think this is a "knock-out first strike" nuclear UAV...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-04-27 18:44  

#14  This isn't for CAS but deep attack missions like the F-117 used to perform. Notice no surveillance/targeting turret on the underside. Stealth isn't needed to plink cavemen and props will always give longer loiter time than jets.
Posted by: ed   2009-04-27 18:24  

#13  For the missions the MQ-9 Reaper performs, the additional speed and "stealth" of the Predator C aren't really necessary. There may be a need for it down the road, but it will be for different missions. For the time being, the AF is flat out building MQ-9s.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said in February that the Air Force should maximize production of the MQ-9 Reaper with the intent of fielding 50 Predator / Reaper Combat Air Patrols (CAPs) by 2011. A CAP typically involves 4 MQ-9s to provide 24 / 7 coverage in the designated area. The AF plan is to eventually replace all MQ-1B Predators with Reapers. Between the Air Force production of MQ-9s and MQ-1Bs and the Army program for MQ-1C Sky Warriors, General Atomics, the manufacturer is running full tilt in its recently expanded new production facilities. The Air Force is buying them as fast as GA can build them.
Posted by: rwv   2009-04-27 18:01  

#12  #2 Yeah, what the hell does it have to be fast for?

Although not anywhere in the league of top speed for a fighter, it's (listed) 460 mph (assumably top) speed is approximately 60% of a fast B-2 Spirit (as advertised) at 70-degrees F.

In addition to loiter abilities, it is a nice and cheap (as compared to a manned a/c) little radar engager/fooler to allow our future Right Wing Extremists the opportunity to light up and destroy "enemy combatant" ground radars.
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2009-04-27 17:43  

#11  It would be the most beautiful exhibit by far.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-04-27 17:27  

#10  the avenger can hit more than one target and then come home to moma.

Damn... we've got a secret headquarters on top of a MUSEUM? (Lots of loiter time over nearby Turtle Bay-cool.)
Sorry, WI- couldn't resist.
Posted by: Free Radical   2009-04-27 17:24  

#9  Why not tow the plane up-to altitude like a glider does?

Surely that would massively increase the range?

Also could you increase the loiter time by basically getting as high as possible then gliding down with the engines off(/ lowest).
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-04-27 17:24  

#8  A small turbofan is also easier to shield from radar than the prop on a turboprop.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-04-27 16:56  

#7  Yeah, what the hell does it have to be fast for? So it can hurry up and loiter?

Yes. Makes UAV asset availability and redeployment better.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-04-27 16:33  

#6  We need something like this to replace or compliment the tomahawk missions. Instead of a tomahawk smashing into a target and then going to heaven, the avenger can hit more than one target and then come home to moma.
Posted by: Wild Indian   2009-04-27 16:32  

#5  The old "spad" was loved by a lot of commanders on the ground because it could loiter over a target with a lot of ordinance.

This is great stuff and is to me a variation on the old Ranger motto "We own the night"
Posted by: James Carville   2009-04-27 14:39  

#4  Sorry for the typos - impatience and disgust don't mix well.
Posted by: Phineth the Anonymous8743   2009-04-27 14:23  

#3  The Avenger requires a caveat as the possible successor, though, because the Air Force hasn't yet signed a contract for a next-generation unmanned aircraft.

In a statement, Air Force officials commended General Atomics for building the Avenger. But Capt. Stacy Orlowsky, a service spokeswoman, said it wasn't a done deal to expect the Avenger to join the Air Force fleet."If the Air Force establishes new UAS requirements, we anticipate an open competition to select the best material solution," she said.

This isn't the first time General Atomics has taken this approach. It developed the Reaper and Predator the same way -- not waiting for contracts from any of the services.


Ph brother - where have we heard this before? Oh yeah, maybe when the Wright Broters had to go to France while the War Department was waiting for Langley to invent the airplane.

I wonder if the "open competition" will include allowing General Atomics squadron to blow the others out of the sky?

I wonder if the IDF has an order in for rush delivery, say - next week?

How far away are we from the Blackwater Navy acquiring a CCV to accomodate an air wing of these?
Posted by: Phineth the Anonymous8743   2009-04-27 14:22  

#2  Yeah, what the hell does it have to be fast for? So it can hurry up and loiter? It spends its time in racetrack patterns in the sky at the most fuel-efficient setting.

PS "Gorgon Stare" cool name!
Posted by: gromky   2009-04-27 14:02  

#1  "Commanders have come to value unmanned aircraft's ability to loiter over targets."

Yeah, it is a lot easier for a pilot of a UAV to switch off with someone else so he can take a crap or get a meal than it would be with a manned craft. I couldn't imagine sitting for 22hours in one spot and being comfortable afterward.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-04-27 13:37  

00:00