You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Holder close to making decision on Gitmo detainees
2009-04-27
LONDON (AP) -- The United States is "relatively close" to making decisions on what to do with an initial group of Guantanamo Bay detainees, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Sunday.

Holder spoke to The Associated Press during a flight to London, the first of several stops where he will visit with European leaders to discuss terrorism, drugs, and cyber-crime. The attorney general did not say how much longer he thought it would take to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba. Before officials can meet President Barack Obama's January deadline, the U.S. must first decide which detainees to put on trial and which to release to the U.S. or other countries.

Holder said the first step is to decide how many total detainees will be set free. "We're doing these all on a rolling basis," he said. "I think we're probably relatively close to making some calls."

After eight years in which the previous Bush administration alienated European nations over issues like the Iraq war and Guantanamo Bay, the Obama administration is trying to strengthen those ties. "I don't think they're looking for as much of American leadership as a partnership," said Holder.
Is that what they call it when they leave you holding the bag?
The Obama administration is edging toward taking some Guantanamo prisoners to the U.S., most likely to Virginia. They are Chinese Muslims known as Uighurs, and their supporters say they never should have been at Guantanamo in the first place.

Republicans in Congress say Guantanamo should remain in operation and are mobilizing to fight the release of detainees into the United States.

Against that backdrop, Holder hoped to reassure skeptical Europeans without generating too much public opposition back home. After meetings in London and Prague, the attorney general is to give a speech Wednesday night in Berlin about Guantanamo.

Austria's interior minister, Maria Fekter, has insisted her country would not take any prisoners. "If the detainees are no longer dangerous, why don't they stay in the U.S.?" she asked.
Good point. We'll remind you of this next time you need our help.
Simon Koschut, an associate fellow with the German Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin, spoke of the difficulty facing Holder in trying to find a consensus among European leaders. "In Germany, many are asking why America isn't taking care of its own business. If you started it, you ought to finish it," Koschut said.
Ditto to you, Germany. Sure hope the Fulda Gap doesn't need defending any time in the next century.
Several European nations, including Portugal and Lithuania, have said they will consider taking such detainees. Others are less interested and don't want their neighbors to accept any prisoners either, because of the ease of travel within the European Union.

In some nations are internal divisions. Germany's foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, has raised the possibility his country could take detainees, arguing that the camp's closure should not fail because the prisoners have nowhere to go. But Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble has said the detainees are primarily a U.S. responsibility.

Given that debate, that's all the more reason, say some, for the U.S. to release some Guantanamo prisoners in the U.S. as quickly as possible to generate good will.
And never mind if any of them travel to Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistain to kill Western soldiers.
Any country that takes [the Uighurs] is likely to anger Beijing. "No one else is going to do it. No one else is going to take that heat when they didn't create the problem. So we have to do it," said Sabin Willet, a lawyer for the Uighurs. "They need to unlock the door soon."

Some Republicans, though, want to keep the doors bolted. "There is reason to believe (the Uighurs) are not as peaceful or as nonthreatening as the administration seems to be suggesting," said New York Rep. Peter King, the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee.
All it takes is for one of them -- one -- to commit a crime after being released and Holder will be gone as AG. He ought to know that.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  It seems like this wouldn't be the AGs decision unless BO has made a decision that these cases are to be tried in the U.S. court system rather than the military system. That means they will have to stuff them somewhere in the criminal justice system in the U.S. while awaiting trial. That means more taxpayer costs until these cases work their way through the system. Why not just shoot them and then issue an apology (snark).
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-04-27 18:12  

#5  Well, these Uighurs were just innocent kids off on a mountain holiday in Afghanistan when the evil Americans scooped them up and tortured them for the fun of it for years in Gitmo. If they commit crimes now, who can blame them after all the torture and other distress they suffered?
/sarcasm
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-04-27 17:28  

#4  It appears some people still do not grasp the difference between USA and Obambia.

Criminal acts by released Chinese Uighur detainees may not get Holder fired, but it will be one more chink of dissatisfaction in the growing edifice of the People's Republic of Obambia.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-04-27 15:34  

#3  they are from china..yes..send them back to china and let the euro back stabbers wine....and when they are shot by the commies blame europe for not supporting the lefty cause...
Posted by: Dan   2009-04-27 13:40  

#2  All it takes is for one of them -- one -- to commit a crime after being released and Holder will be gone as AG. He ought to know that.

It appears some people still do not grasp the difference between USA and Obambia.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-04-27 04:05  

#1  Actually I sympathize with the Euro's, why should they catch the falling knife that Obama and Holder have dropped?
Posted by: tipover   2009-04-27 01:44  

00:00