| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| The Tea Party Revolution |
| 2009-04-16 |
| By Peter Ferrara Congratulations to the hundreds of spontaneous grassroots organizers who have successfully organized the over 300 tea party events that will take place today across the country. Such events have already been widespread, and highly successful, with sudden big crowds: 2,000 in St. Louis, 3,000 in Cincinnati, 6,000 in Orlando, as recently reported by Peter Roff in a Fox News blog. Because these events are highly decentralized, with no significant institutional organization or funding behind them, they represent a genuine outpouring of grassroots opinion with enormous political importance. For every person out in the streets today, there are undoubtedly many more who didn't make it who share the same opinions. The bigger the demonstrations today, the bigger the rest of the iceberg under water. Moreover, this movement represents genuine grassroots organization, as names and contact information are collected, and this will be valuable for future political activity. These people are both against and for something. They are against the left-wing extremism of the current political leadership in Washington, from Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi, to Barney Frank, to Henry Waxman, and on and on. No wonder Newsweek (soon going out of business) thinks we are a nation of socialists now, as it admitted in a recent cover story. But even more, the tea party revelers are for a sophisticated vision of economic freedom. They recognize that the more resources the government takes out of the private sector, through taxes, borrowing and spending, the less freedom that average working people have left for the pursuit of happiness. Taxes as a percent of GDP, government spending as a percent of GDP, should be taken as reverse indicators of economic freedom. The higher they are, the less economic freedom people have. The lower they are, the more economic freedom we have. In other words, the more the government takes your money to spend on what it wants, the less freedom you have to choose to spend, or to save and invest, your own money as you want. And visa versa. Let us review the already gruesome results of the Obama economic policy to see what has the people out in the streets. Obama's budget for this year increases federal spending by an extremist 34% over the budget adopted for last year, to a total of $4 trillion, the highest ever! Since World War II, going back over 60 years now, federal spending as a percent of GDP has been stable, hovering around 20%. But federal spending for this year under the Obama budget and economic policies will soar to a shocking 28.5%of GDP, an increase in the size of the federal government in Obama's first year of 42% compared to the postwar average relative to GDP. Over the longer run, because of exploding federal entitlements, federal spending will soar to 40% to 50% of GDP, depending on how much permanent damage Obama does. With state and local spending, the total will climb towards 60%, and we will no longer be a free country. The Congressional Budget Office projects Obama's budget deficit for this year at a shocking $1.845 trillion, the highest ever. That would be more than seven times Reagan's largest deficit of $221 billion, which caused so much howling among liberals and Democrats. This Obama budget deficit will total an astounding 13.1% of GDP, more than one-eighth of the entire U.S. economy, for the federal deficit alone! Obama says that this is George Bush's budget deficit. But it wasn't George Bush who led adoption of a $1 trillion stimulus package in February, followed by a $410 billion supplemental spending bill the next week, with a $275 billion housing bailout plan proposed the following week, $634 billion as a down payment on a new national health insurance entitlement adopted in the budget, and another $1 trillion bank bailout plan recently announced as well. (Note: The entire economy produces just $14 trillion a year, so $1 trillion is real money.) Obama said in his national press conference on March 24, "We're doing everything we can to reduce that deficit." But do his actions recounted above look like he is "doing everything we can to reduce that deficit"? The deficit for the last budget adopted when Congress was controlled by Republican majorities, for fiscal 2007, was $162 billion, or 1.2% of GDP. CBO projects that by 2019 under Obama's budget, the deficit will still be well over $1 trillion. Finally, under Obama's budget the national debt will double over the next five years, and triple over the next ten, to $17.3 trillion. The national debt as a percent of GDP will soar from 40% to a peacetime record of 82.4%, almost as large as the entire economy, and twice as high as when Reagan left office. If the economy does not recover permanently next year, as even the CBO assumes (not going to happen long term), Obama could even top the World War II record of national debt at 113% of GDP, spending mostly on welfare and entitlements, rather than on fighting the Nazis and Imperial Japan. Does this sound like we're "moving from an era of borrow-and-spend to one where we save and invest," as Obama also said in his press conference last month? |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #14 New Orleans suburbs of Covington and Metairie had (my estimate) ~800-1000 people each, but that's deceptive, because people came and went, so the total count might be about twice that. Not bad, but still disappointing to me. Interesting comment heard crossing the street: "Here's another dozen going to their first political/protest rally." Age 30-60. Attendance would have been a lot higher if the professors had offered extra credit to students who went, but that only happens for liberal events (held during work/school hours no less.) Clearly the Metairie rally was not organized by professionals, no matter what media spin-meisters claim. Could have used a better sound system. As best I can tell, all the rallies would benefit from being a little more on topic, but that lack is part of the allure. Much more creative signs than average political/protest events. NO trash left after it ended!!! Virtually no minorities; I credit the one black fellow I did see with having a lot of courage to stand up like that for his convictions. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2009-04-16 20:47 |
| #13 Around 3,000 in a cold drizzle in Richmond, Va. Completely filled the space available. Good thing it wasn't warm and sunny or the crowd would have spilled into the street, too. |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2009-04-16 15:30 |
| #12 PowerLine is reporting 8-10K at the State Capital in St. Paul, MN, last night. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/04/023340.php Video, pictures and commentary there as well. |
| Posted by: ExtremeModerate 2009-04-16 13:54 |
| #11 Santa Rosa, CA - we drew about 500 to 600 in the heart of Liberalburg USA. The response of passersby was also very supportive. Local paper has some coverage, more than I expected. The MSM keeps putting this as an epic Republican fail. They're gonna get a shocka come 2010. |
| Posted by: Rex Mundi 2009-04-16 13:27 |
| #10 2000+ in Charlotte. It's too bad the media are portraying these protests as anti-tax, when in reality they are more anti-idiotic-spending. I don't mind paying my taxes...at least when I could trust the government to spend it (somewhat) wisely. |
| Posted by: AllahHateMe 2009-04-16 13:20 |
| #9 Our Pleasanton California Tea Party drew over 3,000 (pop. 67,000). Local news coverage minimal, big story was fishing boat that sank next to the San Mateo bridge. |
| Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC 2009-04-16 11:46 |
| #8 Scanned the 3 networks morning news shows for 30 minutes. Not one word of the hundreds of thousands, maybe million, protesters yesterday. Not on their features or news sections. Back to boycotting the networks, except for one or two shows like The Unit, for another few months. May the networks and |
| Posted by: ed 2009-04-16 09:50 |
| #7 but gave three column inches in the story to one of the few nutty people in the crowd. Why do I smell a plant? |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2009-04-16 09:34 |
| #6 4000 or so in Madison, WI from all over the State. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Janesville) said his piece. The Wisconsin State Journal gave it front page coverage (surprise, surprise) but gave three column inches in the story to one of the few nutty people in the crowd. |
| Posted by: mom 2009-04-16 09:33 |
| #5 16,000 in Sam Antonio - and I heard this from one of the other organizers; this was drawn from an crowd analysis of an aerial shot of the crowd in Alamo Plaza. Although the draw of Ted Nugent and Glenn Beck probably had a lot to do with the turnout. The 'Nuge' did a very well-received impromptu rant that alas, included language which kind of bollixed up the SA Tea Party's aim of being a family-friendly event... |
| Posted by: Sgt. Mom 2009-04-16 08:42 |
| #4 From 300-400 at Iowa City, right by the U of I and in Deep Blue country, and possibly 600 in Cedar Rapids. We weren't allowed to toss actual tea in the rivers....that might pollute them, you see. (BTW the Iowa River is the country's third most foul as far as water quality goes.) I dunno, we probably owe the people tossing symbolic "tea" (dechlorinated water) a bunch for kinda/sorta cleaning up the river a bit yesterday. ;) Naturally the rabid moonbats out here are convinced it's a Repub/Fox News plot. Maybe they've been drinking our "pure" river water, I don't know, but it is amusing to see them get the spittle spewers revved up to 11. |
| Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie 2009-04-16 08:04 |
| #3 The poor fools just don't understand. It's for the Children™ Nancy and the Gang |
| Posted by: Bobby 2009-04-16 06:06 |
| #2 About 300 in a town of 6000 in this particular corner of the midwest. |
| Posted by: AzCat 2009-04-16 01:04 |
| #1 2500 to 3000 in Boise Idaho. Considering the small population to draw from, that is a huge turnout. |
| Posted by: Gluting Fillmore6653 2009-04-16 00:48 |