You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
New York Income Tax Rise Hinted as Budget Gap Grows
2009-03-29
New York Governor David Paterson said next year's record budget gap may be $3 billion greater than the $16.2 billion he announced earlier this week and hinted a tax increase on higher incomes is possible.

The newly estimated gap for the year beginning April 1 was 25 percent more than projections six weeks ago, he said.
Anyone consider cutting all the discretionary spending that was larded on in the last few years of plenty?
"We are right now on the verge of cuts and service reductions that I would have to describe as life threatening," Paterson said. "With situations like that, everything is on the table," he said in response to a question about increasing the state's income tax for high earners.

Paterson and legislative leaders said earlier this week that the deficit continues growing because of falling tax collections in a shrinking economy with rising unemployment. If next year's deficit exceeds the $16.2 billion estimate, the spending plan would be amended, as lawmakers did twice in the current year.

The state Labor Department said yesterday that New York's unemployment rate rose by a record 0.7 percentage point in February to 7.7 percent, the highest since 1993. In New York City, the jobless rate rose 1.2 percentage points to 8.1 percent in February.

Paterson said he continues to press leaders of the Senate and Assembly for spending cuts in addition to the "record" cuts already agreed upon. He didn't identify the kind or amount of the reductions.
Posted by:Fred

#4  NY state has been in iffy financial condition since 9/11. The state bore the economic brunt of the attack in many ways. Yeah, there's plenty of dysfunction in NY as well, but the problems aren't all or even primarily due to discretionary spending.
Posted by: lotp   2009-03-29 19:35  

#3  "We are right now on the verge of cuts and service reductions that I would have to describe as life threatening,"

There are two levels of life threatening cuts. Those that reveal that the product or services were not essential, that society and economy will muddle through as they did before such items even existed, and therefore are terminal to politicians whose death grasp upon them brought the viability of the state into jeopardy. Then there are those which indeed directly effect the health, safety, and basis of economy that politicians will resort to 'first cut' to teach the serfs that they must know their place in tax servitude by their betters. The former only is life threatening to politicians. The latter to the people they fleece serve.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-03-29 09:07  

#2  Yeah, Human Hights violations. They're not bribes to voters, no sir!
Posted by: SteveS   2009-03-29 08:13  

#1  That's not discretionary spending. Those are Human Rights of which you would be Violating.
Posted by: Seafarious   2009-03-29 00:23  

00:00