| Submit your comments on this article |
| Economy |
| Global Warming Alert: Economic Prosperity Hurts Environment |
| 2009-03-26 |
| The United States didn’t ratify the Kyoto Protocol, but Canada did, and its experience is suggestive because its economy and per-capita oil consumption are similar to ours. Its Kyoto target is a six-per-cent reduction from 1990 levels. By 2006, however, despite the expenditure of billions of dollars on climate initiatives, its greenhouse-gas output had increased to a hundred and twenty-two per cent of the goal, and the environment minister described the Kyoto target as “impossible.” The explanation for Canada’s difficulties isn’t complicated: the world’s principal source of man-made greenhouse gases has always been prosperity. The recession makes that relationship easy to see: shuttered factories don’t spew carbon dioxide; the unemployed drive fewer miles and turn down their furnaces, air-conditioners, and swimming-pool heaters; struggling corporations and families cut back on air travel; even affluent people buy less throwaway junk. Gasoline consumption in the United States fell almost six per cent in 2008. That was the result not of a sudden greening of the American consciousness but of the rapid rise in the price of oil during the first half of the year, followed by the full efflorescence of the current economic mess. The world’s financial and energy crises are connected, and they are similar because credit and fossil fuels are forms of leverage: oil, coal, and natural gas are multipliers of labor in much the same way that credit is a multiplier of wealth. Human history is the history of our ascent up what the naturalist Loren Eiseley called “the heat ladder”: coal bested firewood as an amplifier of productivity, and oil and natural gas bested coal. Fossil fuels have enabled us to leverage the strength of our bodies, and we are borrowing against the world’s dwindling store of inexpensive energy in the same way that we borrowed against the illusory equity in our homes. Moreover, American dependence on fossil fuels isn’t going to end any time soon: solar panels and wind turbines provided only about a half per cent of total U.S. energy consumption in 2007, and they don’t work when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing. Replacing oil is going to require more than determination. |
| Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC |
| #3 But if I need to buy a couple of horses, a buggy You've forgotten "Emission Controls" (Horse shit) causing tetanus in the streets, and raw sewage floating through town every rain. That's the main reason "Horsepower is nearly extinct (Not including the Amish and Mormon communities). I have actually seen "Horse Diapers" for City Carriges. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-03-26 23:00 |
| #2 Then it stands to reason that we can afford to forget about global warming until after the world's economies recover. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2009-03-26 18:27 |
| #1 Petroleum is one of the reasons we were able to ban whaling. Seriously. But if I need to buy a couple of horses, a buggy and some whale oil lamps, that's OK. |
| Posted by: Iblis 2009-03-26 17:13 |