You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Bolivia's Morales to landowners: Give up property
2009-03-17
President Evo Morales asked large landowners to voluntarily relinquish some of their holdings to poor Indians during a ceremony held Saturday on property confiscated from a U.S. rancher for redistribution.

Morales made the plea as he handed out 34 rural titles to poor Guarani Indians and small farmers in Alto Parapeti, a region about 385 miles (620 kilometers) southeast of the Bolivian capital of La Paz, where ranchers and landowners have vehemently opposed his agrarian reform program.

The president held the event on the former ranch of U.S. citizen Ronald Larsen, one of several landowners in the wealthy eastern lowlands from whom the government seized a total of 139 square miles (88,960 acres; 36,000 hectares) last month. Morales accused them of letting the land lie fallow or of contracting workers in servitude-like conditions.

Larsen denied the allegations of employee abuse and became a symbol of resistance against Morales' agrarian reform, leading a series of confrontations with government inspectors last year.

Land Minister Alejandro Almaraz has said the 139 square miles of land cannot be redistributed until the National Agrarian Tribunal rules on the landowners' appeal.

Voters in the small South American country last month approved a new constitution empowering the indigenous majority, in part by increasing their control over their traditional lands. That includes the Guarani Indians who worked for decades on Larsen's 58-square-mile (15,000-hectare) spread as cowpoks, cooks, tractor drivers and seasonal hands.

The new constitution limits future private landownership to about 12,350 acres (5,000 hectares).

"There are people ... who don't want to end large landownership," Morales told a gathering of hundreds of Guarani Indians on Saturday. "Those people should voluntarily give up their (excess) land to people who have none."
Posted by:Fred

#5  tw: the prices don't get to go up when the government regulates the prices food conglomerates are willing to charge, but also regulates the prices they have to pay farmers.

by raising one and lowering the other, Chavez was able to get Venezuela stuck in a milk shortage, which they successfully blamed on increaced milk demand in China.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-03-17 10:40  

#4  Prices go up when something above slave wages are given the workers as well, Anonymoose.
Posted by: trailing wife    2009-03-17 10:21  

#3  A much more obvious dilemma is that large farms, almost by their nature, have to use more efficient farming techniques, which produce high yields. Small, indigenous farms use ancient techniques that produce barely enough to sustain the farmer and a few others.

You can get as romantic as you want about indigenous farms, but when thousands of city folk see store shelves empty, and prices jumping, they don't give a crap about romanticism. They want food.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-03-17 10:01  

#2  The right balance (rent-seeking low + maximum land utility) can be found via a land value tax that is then paid out equally (like the Alaska oil dividend).
Posted by: Bright Pebbles the flatulent   2009-03-17 05:28  

#1  Hard to say: Morales is obviously a communist, but those landowners can be pretty brutal assholes, too, more like feudal barons than honest ranchers. I say let 'em fight.
Posted by: gromky   2009-03-17 04:38  

00:00