You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
B.O. Signs 'Imperfect' Spending Bill Away From Cameras
2009-03-12
President Obama acknowledged today that he signed an "imperfect omnibus bill" but told Congress to clean up its act when it comes to pork-barrel projects, better known as earmarks.
One man's "imperfect" is another man's "stench and a pestilence."
The president signed the $410 billion pork-laden spending bill behind closed doors and away from the glare of the cameras. "I am signing an imperfect omnibus bill because it is necessary for the ongoing functions of government. But I also view this as a departure point for more far-reaching change," President Obama said in a speech on earmark reform.

Lashing out against those who have criticized the earmarks in the bill, Obama added: "Now, let me be clear: Done right, earmarks give legislators the opportunity to direct federal money to worthy projects that benefit people in their district, and that's why I have opposed their outright elimination. I also find it ironic that some of those who railed the loudest against this bill because of earmarks actually inserted earmarks of their own -- and will tout them in their own states and districts.

Posted by:Fred

#9  he's signing in private because he's a coward and knows this bill stinks. He doesn't want ads showing that big ol shit-eating grin while porking up the budget against his promises. "Just words"
Posted by: Frank G   2009-03-12 19:20  

#8  "If he's the messiah, how come he's making us suffer for his sins?"
-local guy
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-03-12 12:36  

#7  Signing in private can only be so he can hide from it and distance himself later. He will blame all this on Bush and hide from the true facts.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2009-03-12 11:20  

#6  Imperfect? You pork American Taxpayers and no courtesy reach around?

9000 earmarks - Now, if my proposal had passed where at the end of each month the President has 8 working hours to sign, or at least initial, every pork ear in the spending bill. Tha is 1,125 signitures per hour, or almost 19 per minute. This should be done on CSPAN and webcast; no help or rubber stamping. If these projects are so important show us how, Obama, how you are willing to suffer writer's cramp in order to save America.

How much are they going to spend before 2010? $4 trillion? If 350 million people, not taxpayers but people, in the USA then that is $11,500 per person.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-03-12 10:42  

#5  BOSTON – More than one out of every five dollars of the $126 million Massachusetts is receiving in earmarks from a $410 billion federal spending package is going to help preserve the legacy of the Kennedys.

The bill includes $5.8 million for the planning and design of a building to house a new Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the Senate. The funding may also help support an endowment for the institute.

The bill also includes $22 million to expand facilities at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum and $5 million more for a new gateway to the Boston Harbor Islands on the Rose Kennedy Greenway, a park system in downtown Boston named after Kennedy's mother and built on land opened up by the Big Dig highway project.
Posted by: Beavis   2009-03-12 08:39  

#4  Another fine example of transparency.
Posted by: Besoeker    2009-03-12 07:22  

#3  Setting up an alibi for when the backlash comes?
Posted by: Ebbomotle Untervehr4254   2009-03-12 05:49  

#2  Well, yeah, $500 billion is a more perfect number. I see his point.

/sarc off
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-03-12 04:59  

#1  The buck starts here?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-03-12 04:51  

00:00