You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Conrad: Obama budget lacks votes
2009-03-11
President Obama's budget doesn't have enough support from lawmakers to pass, the Senate Budget Committee chairman said Tuesday.

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said he has spoken to enough colleagues about several different provisions in the budget to make him think Congress won't pass it.

Conrad urged White House budget director Peter Orszag not to "draw lines in the sand" with lawmakers, most notably on Obama's plan for a cap-and-trade system to curb carbon emissions. "Anybody who thinks it will be easy to get the votes on the budget in the conditions that we face is smoking something," Conrad said.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, when asked Tuesday about the Democratic criticism of the budget, told reporters that it wasn't unusual. He noted that lawmakers and the president often have competing agendas. "I don't think, ultimately, the criticism is surprising," Gibbs said. "That certainly happens and is all part of a process."

Conrad joined Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.), the top Republican on the Budget Committee, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in criticizing the administration's cap-and-trade proposal for not doing enough to counterbalance increases in energy costs that will be felt by consumers and companies, especially those in energy states such as North Dakota.

Conrad said that it would be a "distant hope" to expect the climate change plan to pass unless it includes help for industries that would be hit hard by limits on carbon emission production.

Posted by:Fred

#5  the one The One's going to sign today or tomorrow? Thanks Nostradamus Senator Conrad. Genius
Posted by: Frank G   2009-03-11 17:33  

#4  Budget? Who needs a stinking budget when its spend, spend, spend....
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-03-11 09:38  

#3  0 got all he wanted in the porkulus bill and the just passed Omnibus earmark and spend bill. If the budget doesn't pass, he'd gotten what he wanted, welfare returned, socialized medicine, earmarks for all, etc. Maybe the unions can get card check, maybe not.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-03-11 07:22  

#2  Trouble in Paradise? The end of the honeymoon?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-03-11 04:11  

#1  If the Dems insist on paying more for their energy, how about an export surtax levied by the energy producing states instead? The people of Wyoming deserve gold faucets just as much as those in Saudi Arabia.
Posted by: ed   2009-03-11 00:44  

00:00