You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
World must accept possible Taliban election win, says France
2009-03-10
The world must accept the results of Afghanistan's elections in August even if hardline Taliban militants win, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said in an interview on Monday.
Why's that, Bernie? They don't accept the election results if somebody else wins.
"We must respect the result of the elections whatever it is," he told Le Figaro daily. "If the nationalist Taliban come to power through the vote and accept the constitution, that is the Afghans' business.
But they've specifically said they're not accepting the constitution. They demand foreign forces leave and power be handed over to them. You've seen the way they wielded power when Mullah Omar was potentate and in the way the Pak version rolls roughshod over NWFP and the tribal areas.
"What we cannot accept is support for international jihad," Kouchner added.
Which was how we got there in the first place.
The French minister added that "there is no question of making (Afghanistan) a Western-style democracy".
There actually shoulda been, but it's too late now.
Afghanistan's electoral authorities have delayed what will be only the country's second presidential elections from April to August because of logistical and security problems in the war-ravaged nation.
Most of those problems are in Pashtunistan, the rest of the country actually being relatively civilized...
Nearly seven years after they were ousted from government, the Taliban are still actively waging an insurgency aimed at toppling the Western-backed administration of President Hamid Karzai.
As usual, the Talibs aren't very good at it but the western press thinks they are because the guys with turbans say they are. Since ignorance is bliss they don't actually study tactics and strategy, and since individual honor is of paramount importance they don't take well to discipline. So they fight in pickup teams under warlords, and the planning is done by their Arab overlords, who aren't very good at fighting themselves but are happy to send large numbers of aborigines to leave this vale of tears in pursuit of minimal gains. The minimal gains add up over time, but the kill ratios still remain something like 40:1. The middle ranks of the warlord class have to race against time in their pursuit of victory because chances are pretty good they're going to be dronezapped, while the actual head cheeses -- Binny, Ayman, Mullah Omar, Hek, and Jalaluddin Haqqani -- remain well and truly hidden away, protected by a combination of fundo party big turbans, who regard them as tools for achieving their own personal power, and ISI, who regard them as strategic assets for regional domination, whether they can control them or not.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Well, let's just send Jimmah Cahtah over there to observe the results, and then we can accept them as legitimate. (Snicker.)
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-03-10 19:55  

#10  Uh, uh, ..... AND IFF WE SAY "NO"!?

Gut Nuthin.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-03-10 18:40  

#9  Did we honor Hitler's "Election".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-03-10 16:54  

#8  I think that touches a fundamental question that no one in the political class has dared to address.

What _is_ the "War in Afghanistan" really?

Is it a rescue mission, a mission to liberate a friendly and allied people?

Or is it a war on an enemy nation and an enemy people? An act of retribution for a mass fatality attack on a NATO country?

I'm heavily leaning towards the second option. The large majority of Afghans have made it very clear that they don't want to see western style government and freedoms in their country, in fact they want to take away our rights and freedoms here in the west. (See the apostate case, the blasphemy case, the Karzai governments threats over the Danish cartoons, also the honor killings among Afghans e.g. in Germany etc).
Posted by: Gerthudion Slaick1764   2009-03-10 16:52  

#7  "World Must Accept Possible Taliban Election Win, says France"

When I first read this headline, I thought they were talking about France, not Afghanistan. I forgot the Frence elections are in 2012, not this year!
Posted by: Carbon Monoxide   2009-03-10 15:03  

#6  We've given tons of foreign aid throughout Africa and turn our backs on the thieving, murdering "democratically elected" thugs in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Let's not be too critical of the French. The pragmatist view. It keeps me marginally sane as I watch and listen to Barry.
Posted by: Besoeker    2009-03-10 09:02  

#5  I guess the frogs want to gloss over the probability that once in power, elections will become a thing of the past.
Posted by: badanov   2009-03-10 07:57  

#4  No suprises here ..

Pass the cheese , mr surrender monkey . Perhaps they forget that even when their country gets rolled , we'll bail them out , and expect no thanks for it

Posted by: Lonzo Glesh1593   2009-03-10 05:16  

#3  But would the people of Afghanistan support a Taliban win. That is the question.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-03-10 05:09  

#2  Well sarko and his motley xcrew has folded against the rioters in guadeloupe and agred to their demands, so it's only logical they would fold even more against the taliban. Makes sense!
Posted by: anonymous5089   2009-03-10 02:48  

#1  I think it's important to respect peoples' right to choose. Living with the fallout (sometimes literally) of their bad choices - we needn't respect or tolerate very much at all...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2009-03-10 01:12  

00:00