| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Pathologising dissent? Now thatÂ’s Orwellian |
| 2009-03-07 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #8 that's "Mrs. Cankles Who Doesn't Know Russian From Shit" too you, sir! Good Day! |
| Posted by: Frank G 2009-03-07 18:17 |
| #7 I have it on the authority of one Mrs. William Jefferson Blythe Clinton that we have a right to disagree and to debate with any administration. I heard her shriek it with my own ears. |
| Posted by: eLarson 2009-03-07 17:08 |
| #6 We are afraid of personal independence. Which carries the tag - personal responsibility. Much easier to 'blame the man' or 'blame the system' or 'them' then take the responsibility and consequences that come with it. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-03-07 11:35 |
| #5 People who believe in the intent of the Second Amendment and act on it ARE insurrectionists. But there are very few. AG Holder does have a point about being a nation of cowards, but it's not only about race. We are afraid of personal independence. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2009-03-07 11:27 |
| #4 Funny thing is, it wasn't that long ago that dissent was the highest form of patriotism. |
| Posted by: Mike 2009-03-07 07:48 |
| #3 You ain't seen nuthing yet. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-03-07 07:38 |
| #2 rath=rather |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2009-03-07 06:55 |
| #1 I saw a web page once for some extreme gun control group that claimed that people who believed in the intent of the 2nd Amendment were not patriots but rath - get this - insurrectionists. Didn't the USSR use to do this to people? |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2009-03-07 06:55 |