| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Judges put limits on absentee ballots in MN senate trial |
| 2009-02-14 |
| Republican Norm Coleman was dealt a major legal blow Friday evening as the three judge panel overseeing the post-election trial issued an order that significantly limits which rejected absentee ballots may be reconsidered in Minnesota's U.S. Senate race election. Counting improperly rejected absentee ballots to prevent what they say was voter disenfranchisement has been a pivotal theme of Coleman's case. In their order, the judges said they are "confident that...there is no systemic problem of disenfranchisement in the state's election system, including in its absentee balloting procedures." They also stressed that merely proving a ballot was rejected wrongfully -- the issue much of the testimony thus far has been devoted to -- is not sufficient grounds to request that it be opened and counted. That voter, they said, may have cast a ballot in person on Election Day, or submitted a subsequent absentee ballot that was counted. They wrote that each side must prove that the ballots they want counted were "legally cast" and that cannot be done simply showing a ballot was wrongfully rejected. The judges also outlined ten categories of absentee ballots that will not be considered in the trial because, as they write, the ballots in these categories "are not legally cast under relevant law." Categories that will not be considered include absentee ballots submitted by non-registered voters, absentee ballots inside a return envelope not signed by the voter or absentee ballot applications that were not signed, and absentee ballots that were dropped off in person on election day. Coleman is challenging the results of the state recount that put Democrat Al Franken in the lead with 225 votes. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #2 "They wrote that each side must prove that the ballots they want counted were "legally cast" and that cannot be done simply showing a ballot was wrongfully rejected." WTF? Shouldn't Coleman's lawyers be petitioning a Federal judge based on this statement to declare the election null & void? The counted 'found' ballots before the recount even began have far more questions surrounding them than any potential absentee ballots. Regardless, this article must have originated at the HuffPost (this is CNN, after all), because the Coleman team sees this ruling in much different light than this article projects, as noted here Page-busting link modified. "...Coleman's attorneys saw it differently, saying that the ruling leaves untouched about 3,500 of the 4,800 rejected absentee ballots they want the court to open and count, enough to make it possible for Coleman to overcome Franken's 225-vote certified recount lead. Coleman lawyer Fritz Knaak said that those remaining votes -- along with the ballots of registered voters who were thought to be nonregistered as well as the ballots of voters whose signatures looked mismatched but weren't -- will eventually result in Coleman's return to the Senate." |
| Posted by: logi_cal 2009-02-14 11:08 |
| #1 Will they go thru and toss the ballots Franken got under those circumstances? This thing is RIGGED. And the people fo Minnesota are complete fricken IDIOTS. Minnesoata, the Stupid State. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2009-02-14 10:52 |