You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
'Incompetent' Hamid Karzai's political future in doubt
2009-01-30
When Hamid Karzai first took to the international stage in Tokyo in 2002 he was hailed as the only man who could reunite and rebuild Afghanistan after three decades of war. Seven years on, the new US Administration appears to see him as a liability rather than an asset, and looks increasingly likely to seek an alternative candidate to support in the coming election.
Paging Mr. Diem, Mr. Ngo Dinh Diem, to the red courtesy phone ...
The political future of the Afghan President will be high on the agenda for Richard Holbrooke, the new US special envoy on Pakistan and Afghanistan, who will visit the two countries for the first time in that role next week.

President Obama, Vice-President Biden and Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State, are frustrated by the corruption and incompetence of the Karzai administration, diplomatic sources have told The Times. US officials have been particularly angered by persistent allegations that Mr Karzai's half-brother is involved in the drug trade, and by the President's repeated criticism of US raids that cause civilian casualties, the sources said. One US official said that Afghanistan was becoming “a narco-state”, providing 90 per cent of the world's illegal opium, while Mr Karzai appeared unable to govern outside Kabul or provide services to his citizens.
And good luck finding a replacement ...
President Bush, despite criticism of the Afghan leader from allies such as Britain, remained steadfastedly loyal to Mr Karzai, telling The Times last year that he found him to be an honest man.

Mr Obama, by contrast, was reported by The New York Times this week to be planning to abandon Mr Bush's fortnightly video-conference calls with Mr Karzai. Speaking at the Pentagon on Wednesday, Mr Obama signalled that he was preparing to make “some difficult decisions” in Afghanistan.

Speculation about Mr Karzai's political demise mounted last week when it was reported that an unofficial delegation of four potential candidates for the Afghan presidency had visited Washington. The delegation reportedly consisted of Dr Abdullah Abdullah, a former Foreign Minister; Dr Ashraf Ghani, a former Finance Minister; Ali Ahmad Jalali, a former Interior Minister; and Gul Agha Sherzai, Governor of the eastern province of Nangahar. The four men have neither confirmed nor denied the meeting.
I guess Afghanistan doesn't have a law like we have that keeps opposition party members from interfering with foreign affairs ...
Mr Obama has been sharply critical of Mr Karzai, saying in July that his Government had “not gotten out of the bunker” to organise Afghanistan's Government.

When Mr Obama visited Afghanistan that month he met Mr Sherzai - the Governor of Nangahar - before seeing Mr Karzai in Kabul. Mr Biden was reported to have been so angered by Mr Karzai at their last meeting that he walked out.

The White House sought to play down the issue, saying that relations with Mr Karzai were part of a wider policy review. Robert Gates, the Defence Secretary, however, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this week that corruption in Afghanistan was a “very serious problem”.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Since Alexander the great and Mo' Hisself are both ancient history, there's nobody available who can effecticely rule Afghanistan.

A radical departure from the current strategy is going to have to happen. A-stan needs an economy.

On the off chance that the west is willing to spend a couple generations of hard work and treasure there to develop an eceonomy, it could be a successful nation.
Posted by: Mike N.   2009-01-30 22:26  

#8  Karzai is a tool and is in the drug dealing up to his neck. He should be shown the door post-haste and the destruction of the poppy fields should begin in earnest. Until and unless we do this, there won't be any chance for success. Even then, it is a tenuous chance at best.
Posted by: remoteman   2009-01-30 17:36  

#7  sometimes a guy just outlives his welcome. I dont know as anyone would have done better than Kharzai in 2002, but at this point he is an obstable to progress.

And yeah, given we have tens of thousands of troops on the ground fighting the enemies of the govt in Kabul, its not unreasonable that we have some input.

Sure the taliban will try to use it in their propaganda. Right now they are using the corruption, nepotism, and drug dealing.

I certainly hope that Petraus as well as Gates get input into the US decision. I havent heard that either is keen on keeping Kharzai.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2009-01-30 15:26  

#6  How about he makes Biden, like, Viceroy of Afghanistan?
Posted by: tu3031   2009-01-30 13:29  

#5  The Taliban will have a propaganda field day if the U.S. starts imposing presidents on the country.

I wonder if O is looking for an exit excuse.
Posted by: DoDo   2009-01-30 13:26  

#4  Sounds like a Chicago quagmire OP. Time to load up and get out.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-01-30 12:05  

#3  The problem with Hamid Karzai is that he's a Pashtun first, Afghanistani second. What's really necessary in Afghanistan is a president elected from the entire population, and vice-presidents from each of the three major tribal groups - Pashtuns, Tajiks, and Uzbeks. With Karzai, you've got a president that's looking out for about a third of the country, and telling the rest to go hang. Ninety percent of the problems in Afghanistan are in the Pashtun areas, and much of it leaks over from the Pashtun areas of Pakistan. That's one reason I suggested dismembering Pakistan - divide it along the Indus River, with the western half of the country being absorbed by Afghanistan. That would unite the Pashtuns, add the Balouchis into the mix of tribes, and provide some form of income other than opium for Afghanistan. It would also allow development of several large mineral deposits in both the Tribal areas and Afghanistan without the necessity of transshipping those minerals through Pakistan - also eliminating all the "tarrifs, taxes, graft and corruption" that otherwise exists.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-01-30 11:56  

#2  The problem with Karzai is that he's a Taliban appeaser. Has he ever said they are outlaws who must be defeated?
Posted by: Apostate   2009-01-30 06:17  

#1  "Wanted. A President for Afghanistan. Candidates with proven ability as miracle workers will be given preference."
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-01-30 06:07  

00:00