You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Harry Reid: "spineless, shifty hack"
2009-01-07
Jacob Sullurn, "Hit & Run" @ Reason Magazine

The Washington Post and The Boston Globe are both reporting that the Senate's Democratic leaders, after insisting that no one appointed by Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich would be allowed to replace Barack Obama, are getting ready to let Roland Burris take his seat after all. Although Burris was not seated yesterday, ostensibly because his appointment papers did not bear the signature of Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid met with him today and signaled that he will eventually be allowed to serve. . . .

White refused to sign Burris' credentials because he did not think a governor facing corruption charges should appoint Obama's successor, especially since Blagojevich is accused of trying (or at least hopng) to get something of value in exchange for that appointment. But White does not seem to have any legal grounds for withholding his signature, and he now says it doesn't matter anyway, telling WGN Radio "they could have seated him without my signature," which he called purely "ceremonial." He confidently predicted that Burris would be seated. Unless Burris testifies tomorrow that he bribed Blagojevich to choose him (an allegation no one has made), it sounds like he could be seated in a matter of days.

That's the right decision, since it's the one required by law. But by announcing that Burris would be barred from the Senate as a matter of principle and quickly giving in, Reid and his allies look like the spineless, shifty hacks they are. By trying to avoid the embarrassment of serving with a man appointed by a fellow Democrat accused of corruption, they have only magnified their humiliation. . . .
Posted by:Mike

#7  I don't think I've ever seen a more unimpressive man.

He is not alone, there are quite a few in Congress. Maybe Nevada will wake up to his mediocrity and not re-elect him in 2010. One can hope.
Posted by: Snusomble Jones2789   2009-01-07 17:55  

#6  What's the difference between Harry Reid and Boland Burris?

One is a mediocrity with a big ego who has claimed to be clueless as major contributors to Democratic campaigns have been awarded large govt favors and the other is from Illinois.
Posted by: mhw   2009-01-07 16:12  

#5  Congress has approval ratings now around 20 percent. Good old Harry is working hard to get those numbers down to single digits. God bless him in his noble effort to discredit our Democratic Congress. They deserve it and he's the man to get the job done.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-01-07 14:59  

#4   I don't think I've ever seen a more unimpressive man.

There's soon to be Senator Al Franken
Posted by: macofromoc   2009-01-07 14:41  

#3  Harry's a mindless twit who does what he's told. He should remember that whenever he thinks about running his mouth. I don't think I've ever seen a more unimpressive man.
Posted by: tu3031   2009-01-07 14:06  

#2  Harry's afraid that Illinois won't vote for a black Democratic Senate candidate in a state-wide election.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-01-07 14:03  

#1  ...and "racist"

Fox reported that, Burris was Reid's 3rd black candidate that was turned down by Reid. Democrat senators are the real racists and they need to be exposed.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2009-01-07 13:48  

00:00