| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| Conditioning Gaza: preparing to deploy international forces in Palestine? |
| 2009-01-06 |
| The Israeli attack on Gaza is likely timed to coincide with the February elections in Israel and this month's inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama in anticipation of launching a comprehensive Middle East peace plan. The ultimate goal of the Gaza invasion is to create the conditions to introduce international troops into Palestine. Part of the purpose is to prop up the regime of President Mahmoud Abbas and allow the Palestinian leader to extend his mandate across all of Palestine. By calling for international military support, Abbas is seeking to end both the violence and the Israeli occupation at once. The hope is that he will re-establish his legitimacy and provide the grounds for a two-state solution as prescribed in President George Bush's 2002 UN Security Council Resolution 1397, "of two States, Israel and Palestine, living side by side within secure and recognized borders," a proposition openly rejected by Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement, and Likud, the Israeli right-wing party. The idea for an international military intervention was first proposed by Martin Indyk, the former US ambassador to Israel under presidents Bill Clinton and George Bush 43, in a 2003 Foreign Affairs article, "A Trusteeship for Palestine?" The main idea is to replace the Israeli occupation with an international force that would train and guide the Palestinians into self-rule, while ensuring the security of both Israel and Palestine. Indyk reiterated the plan in the summer of 2007 soon after Hamas took over Gaza. In a follow up to the Foreign Affairs article, he proposes the international force "partner" with the Palestinian Authority - rather than replace it as he had initially proposed - in an effort to extend control over all of Palestine, including Gaza. He argues that Hamas' control of Gaza does not undermine the trusteeship's long-term goal, but provides an opportunity to isolate Hamas (Fatah did stand down the majority of its troops), suffocate it (through the siege), and then dismantle it (following an invasion, which we are tragically witnessing today). |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #5 It looks like the truce momentum has increased a lot today. Probably Israel has less than 100 hours to neutralize Hamas. Given this: Israel should also demand an international presence in Sederot and various other places to verify rocket attacks from Gaza. Israel should also demand an international canal be built between Egypt and Gaza to hinder tunnels. |
| Posted by: mhw 2009-01-06 12:59 |
| #4 An international force comprised of Iraqi Kurds might be good. They would be Sunni and trustworthy which is a rare combination (and Shia Kurds could be ready for action on Israeli's northern border if needed, a direct threat to Syria). Plus it would give Iraq some high profile international prestige. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2009-01-06 12:43 |
| #3 No it's a step of liberating Land of Israel (and eventually the entire Middle East) from Arab occupation. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-01-06 11:29 |
| #2 Oh goody. More corrupt international forces that actually help the bad guys. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2009-01-06 08:10 |
| #1 Lemme guess who's gonna have to bankroll this 'International Force'. AND take all the bullsh*t for it. AND listen to all the bellyaching from the left end. AND put up with the Paleostains. AND be vilified for all our efforts. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2009-01-06 06:59 |