Submit your comments on this article | |
China-Japan-Koreas | |
U.S. War Hysteria under Fire | |
2008-12-28 | |
(KCNA) -- This year the U.S. hard-line conservative forces have perpetrated unprecedented provocative moves in a bid to bring the six-party talks to deadlock, check the settlement of the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula and strain the situation on the peninsula. Rodong Sinmun Friday observes this in a signed article. Accusing the U.S. hard-line conservative forces of letting loose a whole string of malignant remarks to lay a hurdle in the way of the progress of the six-party talks, the article notes that this is designed to achieve their criminal purpose to render the DPRK-U.S. relations extremely tense and thus execute their hostile policy towards the DPRK. It is the ulterior intention of the U.S. bellicose forces to drive the situation to the brink of a war by increasing the pressure upon the DPRK with a hard-line big stick policy, not through the negotiated solution of the problem, and torpedoing denuclearization process on the peninsula, the article notes, and goes on: The U.S. bellicose forces have staged frantic war exercises targeted against the DPRK by mobilizing their allied forces at a time when the denuclearization was under way on the peninsula. This clearly indicates that they do not stand for the peaceful settlement of the nuclear issue but seek to stem the trend of dialogue and peace and stifle the DPRK by force of arms.
The U.S. double-dealing tactics will never work on the DPRK. It is the DPRK's independent mode of retaliation to counter the enemy brandishing a knife with a long sword and his use of gun with an artillery piece. The U.S. imperialists' policy to stifle the DPRK militarily is bound to go bust. The U.S. bellicose forces would be well advised to behave themselves, properly understanding the mental power and military muscle of the DPRK. | |
Posted by:Fred |
#8 WAFF/PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM > WILL BOSNIA TEST THE NEW OBAMA ADMINISTRATION? [rising Serb, Croat-Muslim Bosniaks militant sectarianism], + RUSSIA AND SERBIA ARE BROTHERS [like China + Pakland]. * WORLD MIL FORUM > RUSSIAN MORNING NEWS: WILL THE NEW OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND USA LAUNCH A THIRD WORLD WAR, espec Russ-alleged, Dubya-Obama beloved "INTENTIONAL CONTROLLED/MANAGED CHAOS" + GEOPOL IMPERIALISM vee CRIMEA??? The Bam-Man is expected to continue MOST, IFF NOT ALL, OF POTUS PREDECESSOR DUBYA's WOT POLICIES. Also from SAME > CHINA-VIETNAM DISPUTE OVER NANSHA ISLANDS SHARPENS/ESCALATES [Brit Petroleum Corpor = Oil-Gas dev]; + CHINA HAD CLASSIFIED THE REGIONALLY DISPUTED SPRATLEYS + XISHA ISLANDS AS JURISDICTIONALLY PART OF ITS MAINLAND HAINAN PROVINCE, + CHINA'S RISING HARDLINE: DAOYU ISLANDS [Japan], PLA TROOPS DEPLOYMENTS TO SOUTHWEST, WESTERN CHINA, PLAN FLEET AGZ SOMALI PIRACY....; + CHINA: MUMBAI ATTACKS ARE A DIRECT THREAT TO CHINA'S MARGINAL WESTERN TERRITORIAL SECURITY, NATIONAL ENERGY SECURITY, HINDERS/BLOCKS CHINA FROM RUSHING TO IRAN's DEFENSE, AND PUTS THE WHOLE OF WESTERN ASIA UNDER THE SPHERE OF US/US-LED INFLUENCE AND IMPERIALISM. And finally, RUSSIAN MEDIAS: MUMBAI ATTACKS ARE A STRATEGIC THREAT TO RUSSIAN SECURITY, ASIAN ORDER. D *** NG IT, MORIARITY, SO MANY NET NEWS ARTICLES TODAY, BUT STILL NO SUBWAY TWO-FOR-ONE DEAL - WTH KIND OF US-GLOBAL RECESSION/ DEPRESSION II IS THIS! |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-12-28 22:29 |
#7 I think they should get extra points for the "mental power" segment. Couldn't you guys feel the juche? |
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie 2008-12-28 20:21 |
#6 I am partial to the Arab variety. I guess it is a Classical/Jazz preference thing. |
Posted by: Excalibur 2008-12-28 12:03 |
#5 A five. But only because the article got up to speed in its rant, and the echo of Stalinism in the verbage. |
Posted by: Pappy 2008-12-28 11:46 |
#4 Bagh! No 'sea of fire' and not much else. I'll give this a 4 - and I'm being generous. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2008-12-28 10:11 |
#3 Both. A solid, polished performance. Very consistent from start to finish, building up nicely to "The U.S. bellicose forces have staged frantic war exercises" in Par. 5 and " Their reckless military hysteria" in par. 6. Only the clunky "perpetrated unprecedented provocative moves" in par. 1 prevented a more substantial score. I know I have been a lonely voice at times in my appreciation of New Wave Spittle. I yield to none in my reverence for Classical Spittle, but to me New Wave has a sweeping grandeur and a dynamic, pulsating rhythm that, in the finest work, can simply ravish the senses. The Old Spittle dries up, and the New Spittle flows. |
Posted by: Grunter 2008-12-28 09:58 |
#2 Style or Execution? |
Posted by: P2k on holiday 2008-12-28 07:51 |
#1 7. |
Posted by: Grunter 2008-12-28 07:34 |