You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
New Yorkers split over their Senator
2008-12-24
New Yorkers are split over who is going to serve as their next Senator with 40% of state voters saying Caroline Kennedy is the right pick.
40 percent go with the expensive hair, 40 percent with the expensive dental work, 20 percent remain undecided.
A Quinnipiac University survey found Tuesday that voters are divided almost right down the middle - 40-41 - on whether Caroline Kennedy is qualified to occupy Hillary Clinton's Senate seat or Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, but they nevertheless believe by a wide margin (48-25) that Gov. David Paterson will choose her. "Among New Yorkers in general, Caroline Kennedy's grade is just OK," said Maurice Carroll, director of Quinnipiac University's Polling Institute, reported AFP. "Ask the question two ways: Should the governor appoint Ms. Kennedy? New Yorkers give her a narrow lead over Cuomo. Will he appoint her? Heavily, the answer is 'yes.'"

Thirty-three percent of voters said Paterson should name Kennedy to the seat while 29 percent preferred Cuomo. Cuomo, son of former New York governor Mario Cuomo, has a slight edge over Kennedy with upstate voters (31-27), while she has a wide lead in New York City (42-37) and they're neck-and-neck at 30 percent each in the suburbs. Quinnipiac University conducted the poll between December 17 and 21.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Would you deny the Infanta Kennedy her birthright? What a bunch of sniveling peasants!
Posted by: DMFD   2008-12-24 14:29  

#8  After the ONE'S comparison to JFK and Camelot, does this come as any surprise??
Posted by: WolfDog   2008-12-24 11:40  

#7  So far, we have Princess Caroline of Hyannis Port, Duchess of Manhattan, Senator from Suva, Dame Warden of the Red Sock.
Posted by: Grunter   2008-12-24 11:34  

#6  New York should be ashamed to even consider these carpet baggers. If you live part time in Manhattan you are not really a New Yorker. If you lived in Washington DC/Arkansas/Chicago you are not really a New Yorker.

Yes it works while signing baseball players but it's an embarrasment for politics.

Cuomo should say NY doesn't need a Red Socks fan as Governor and let her either (a) badmouth the Red Socks or (b) be dumped from consideration for the Bostonian she is.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-12-24 10:50  

#5  I wanna be Master of the Presidential Hounds, altho I will settle for Chief Whipper-ThereIn.


/boooooooooooootssssssss!
Posted by: .5MT   2008-12-24 09:43  

#4  As well as the Duchess of Manhattan. Royalty can have as many titles as they want, after all.
Posted by: Grunter   2008-12-24 08:56  

#3  Maybe she should become the Senator of Suva?
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-12-24 07:44  

#2  You know a Land Value Tax would end dynasties like these very quickly.

It's the only "good" tax.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-12-24 04:01  

#1  Kennedy Declines to Make Financial Disclosure

Back in 1935, Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Sr., purchased Merchandise Mart, a Chicago real estate company, and according to Schweizer:

“…in 1947, he divided its ownership among family members and put it in the form of a trust…. [it] was not set up in their home state of Massachusetts, New York, Florida, or even California. This trust wasn’t even domiciled in the United States. Instead the Kennedy trust was set up in … Fiji.”

Now why establish a trust on an island best known for headhunters? The Fiji-based trust allowed the Kennedy’s to avoid “…the possibility of scrutiny by the IRS and federal authorities,” according to Schweizer. Worse, the sanctimonious Kennedy clan that demands the rich pay their fair share has “an intricate web of trusts and private foundations” that helps the family avoid the IRS.

For example, the family paid only $134,330.90 in estate taxes despite a family fortune thought to be between $300 and $500 million at the time of Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr.Â’s death in 1969. That was a tax bill of .04 percent, and Schweizer informs us that the figure is based on the lower end of the estimated family fortune.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-12-24 01:09  

00:00