You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Will Bush be prosecuted?
2008-12-18
BDS fights to retain toehold at The Nation.
Posted by:ryuge

#9  IIRC, Ms. Schapiro was a former FAA administrator that first brought the issue of unapproved aircraft parts (counterfeit) to light. But due to back stage pressure she was forced to resign and the program watered down to what is now called "suspect unapproved parts," where there is a bigger burden of proof required to get the bogus parts yanked and junked. Seems that there were some aircraft recyclers getting a bit fast and loose with reselling parts off crashed birds ( as in going to the scene of the crash and dragging struts, and other big major parts away while, in some cases, the victims had not yet been removed). there was also the problem of anybody with a lathe making parts and putting tags on them and selling them, and then the birds would fall outof the sky.
i think she is basically a good person.
why she is playing in this pool is beyond me.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-12-18 17:17  

#8  Seems to be a U.S. thing:

If you haven't got a clue, sue
Posted by: European Conservative   2008-12-18 17:06  

#7  Carter should be prosecuted - and convicted - for hating America and general assholery, 'moose.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-12-18 14:36  

#6  There is the assumption of a "pocket pardon" with regards to former presidents. In essence, the assumption is that they created a pardon for their high ranking cabinet officers and themselves, which they never make public, and retain after they leave office.

This avoids the ugly alternative, that once the Republicans got back into office, they would retroactively prosecute Obama, Clinton and Carter for wrongdoing.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-12-18 13:28  

#5  Yes, it's already started in Loonyville...

“One investor, Lawrence Velvel, 69, dean of the Massachusetts School of Law, said he and a friend may have lost millions of dollars between them. “This is a major disaster for a lot of people… You work all your life, you finally manage to save up something, and somebody who’s entrusted with it, it turns out suddenly he’s a crook. Lots of people are getting fully or partially wiped out.”

How very convenient that MadoffÂ’s arrest also financially decapitates Velvel. Please draw your own conclusion and act accordingly.

Madoff! You magnificent bastard!!
Posted by: tu3031   2008-12-18 11:14  

#4  It starts the Roman cycle of prosecuting the predecessors. That sort of lead to the little Rubican incident with Caesar. That worked out well for the republic didn't it. Fools and the fools that travel with them, they be.
Posted by: P2k on holiday   2008-12-18 09:01  

#3  Story HERE:

Mary Schapiro, Barack Obama's choice to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), previously appointed one of Bernard Madoff's sons to a regulatory body that oversees American securities firms.

It has emerged that in 2001, Ms Schapiro, currently chief executive of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra), employed Mark Madoff to serve on the board of the National Adjudicatory Council — the division that reviews disciplinary decisions made by Finra.

Last week, Mark Madoff, with his brother, Andrew, were understood to have approached the authorities after their father apparently confessed to orchestrating a $50 billion securities fraud.

Mr Madoff is under house arrest in his $7 million Manhattan apartment and will be electronically tagged after he failed to secure further signatories to guarantee his $10 million bail.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-12-18 08:16  

#2  At the close, conference convener Dean Lawrence Velvel of the Massachusetts School of Law noted more than twenty strategies and specific actions..

This is the same Velvel who invested in the Madoff Ponzi scheme but won't say how much (hey, some things are confidential, unlike matters of national security, which must be exposed to the light of day ASAP.) Karma's a bitch.
Posted by: Matt   2008-12-18 08:11  

#1  If yes, it will be for all the wrong reasons.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-12-18 05:26  

00:00