You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Round 1: Pelosi Bags a Dingell
2008-11-21
The first round of a rare committee chairmanship fight in the U.S. House is over, with Henry Waxman, who is seeking to grab the powerful Energy and Commerce gavel from John Dingell, winning a vote of the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, 25-22. The outcome is hardly final, and Dingell will now appeal the matter to the full Democratic caucus, which will probably vote tomorrow.

Waxman's initial victory, however, is noteworthy because the Steering and Policy Committee, which makes formal recommendations to the whole caucus on committee assignments, is packed with Speaker Nancy Pelosi's loyalists. Pelosi has been publicly neutral in the Waxman-Dingell contest, but there are plenty of reasons to suspect she's with Waxman -- and may have even encouraged him to run. His win in what is essentially her committee will only fuel these suspicions.

Still, it's entirely possible that the whole caucus will reverse the Steering and Policy verdict tomorrow. Chairmanship fights are rare, particularly on the Democratic side, because of the primacy of the seniority system. The last successful challenge on the Democratic side (until now, perhaps) came in 1985, when Illinois' Mel Price, well into his 80's and suffering from Parkinson's Disease, was pushed aside as Armed Services chairman by party leaders and replaced by Les Aspin, who won a narrow vote of the full caucus to leapfrog a more senior member.

With the full caucus vote nearing, Dingell's side has been aggressively portraying Waxman's challenge as a threat to the seniority system, calculating that Democrats with multiple terms under their belts will think twice before ousting a committee chairman if it could lead to their own seniority being ignored down the road. There are indications that this strategy has worked particularly well with the Congressional Black Caucus, which includes many long-tenured House members from safe districts whose main avenue to power within the House is the seniority system.
Posted by:Fred

#7  They want Dingelll out of the way -- because he puts automakers first over environmentalists.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-11-21 22:03  

#6  I'm sure Beverly Hills knows a lot more than the rest of us about how to make an energy industry, after all, their great-grandparents made fortunes in it.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2008-11-21 21:51  

#5  And they'll get it only if they pretend to be happy with what Beverly Hills wants them to do.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2008-11-21 21:46  

#4  Michigan is counting on the Federal teat. It'll play fine.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-11-21 15:12  

#3  First, a the democratic congress punts on providing support for automakers, presumeably going on vacation. Then they yank Dingell's commerce committee chair.

Wonder how this is playing in Michigan.
Posted by: DoDo   2008-11-21 14:36  

#2  Fill your left pockets with shot, your right with powder. On my command, 20 paces, turn and commence firing. May the best SOB democrat win!
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-11-21 11:40  

#1  Didn't the Dems run on a platform of bipartisan inclusion in 06'?
I'm still waiting for them to do something bipartisan. Oh, wait, they did vote on their salary increase didn't they? That was prolly pretty bipartisan.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-11-21 11:00  

00:00