Submit your comments on this article |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
Pentagon rejects claims of 1991 nuclear explosion in Iraq |
2008-10-11 |
![]() Lt. Col. Patrick Ryder, a media spokesman for the department, told Adnkronos International (AKI) that the US used "only conventional weapons" during the Gulf War. Ryder was responding to claims made by a "The US maintains a number of munitions that have an explosive capability of 5000 pounds (2300 kilogrammes) and larger," Ryder told AKI in a written statement. "It is not possible for us to confirm the exact incident that you are referring to, but I can tell you that only conventional munitions were used during the Gulf War in 1991." |
Posted by:Fred |
#2 "in 1989 there were 32 cases of tumours... in the Basra area" Obviously some under-reporting going on there. |
Posted by: Darrell 2008-10-11 16:56 |
#1 Kinda reminds me of the wild claims from a couple years ago, by an (italian as well) antiwar ngo that the US had used white phosporous as a terror weapon during the first fallujah battle (proof being pics of bodies with the flesh supposedly "charred" while clothes remained intact, an attribute non-sensically attributed to phosphorus-based incendiary weapons), as well as micro-nukes (proof being night pics of mushrooming explosions). The first claim at least was propagated by french teevee in one popular infoshow. |
Posted by: anonymous5089 2008-10-11 15:33 |