You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Will McCain Waste Palin?
2008-09-18
The media is turning the news into a presidential video game. "Hurricane Ike" or "Wall Street Meltdown" appears onscreen, and the media boots up Barack Obama and John McCain to see how well they talk the problem. Mostly they are speaking gobbledygook about things they barely understand. Whatever a credit default swap is, I'm against it. The public is left to wonder if they are voting for a commentator in chief or commander in chief.

Rather than be dragged into the path of the financial storm, the McCain campaign especially needs to refocus on its postconvention momentum. It needs to worry about wasting the political capital Gov. Sarah Palin deposited in the Bank of McCain three weeks ago.

Once Mr. McCain picked Mrs. Palin as his running mate, he demoted "experience" and elevated a government "reform" message. It was the right thing to do. Presidential voters are ambivalent about Beltway-marinated senators like Mr. McCain and Joe Biden. John McCain's edge is his famous reputation as a reform maverick. So far, though, he is not casting his reform message in large enough terms.

Washington is arguably at its lowest ebb in the public mind since before World War II. Join that fact to Sarah Palin's personally gutsy and professionally strong reform credentials, and Mr. McCain has the chance to offer voters a reform presidency in historic terms.

Yes, the Obama campaign is trying to hang the Bush presidency around his neck. Mr. McCain knows -- and should give -- the answer to that: Voter disgust with Washington goes far beyond George W. Bush.

In the 2006 off-year election, voters threw out the Republican bums and turned over control of Congress to the Democrats. In an odd thank-you, the Democratic Congress earned the lowest approval ratings ever recorded in opinion polls.

This decline is not part of the normal ebb and flow of politics. The fall, the malfeasance, is deeper. It's bipartisan. It's endemic. The most acute comment on what Washington has become -- and what the American public knows it has become -- was a federal judge's Sept. 4 sentencing statement for convicted Beltway favor-meister Jack Abramoff.

Standing before federal Judge Ellen Huvelle, Abramoff said, "So much that happens in Washington stretches the envelope, skirts the spirit of the law and lives in loopholes." Agreed, said Judge Huvelle, who hammered Abramoff with an additional 48-month sentence, more than prosecutors had asked. She said simply: "The true victims are members of the public who lost their trust in government."

Forget the Tina Fey SNL mockery and all the marginalia being written about Sarah Palin now. She did four real things in Alaska that make her fit for anyone interested in a reform presidency.

She took on: her party's state chairman, her party's state attorney general, GOP Gov. Frank Murkowski's tainted gas pipeline project, and then she supported a GOP candidate who ran against Alaska's "untouchable" GOP congressional earmarker, Don Young.

One way or another, each episode involved severing the sleazy ties that bind public officials to grasping commercial interests, something even the Democratic left purports to favor.

It isn't just Washington and Juneau. You could open the nozzle on the same reform fire hose to wash the public-private slime out of the capital hallways of New York, New Jersey, California, Illinois and onward.

You say Sarah Palin doesn't have enough "experience" to run Washington? Washington is barely fit to be run.

The problem isn't standard political corruption. The problem is that the $2.8 trillion federal budget is a vast ocean of Beltway pilot fish feeding off scraps from the whale -- lawyers, lobbyists, ex-Members of Congress. No one runs the Sea of Washington. It's too big, too deep.

Barack Obama wants to dig a deeper hole. John McCain should ask the American people if they want this to go on, because it's nonsense to vote for government to do "more" and then whine when it doesn't work or degrades into sweetheart-deal hell.

Unfocused "reform" rhetoric from Mr. McCain isn't enough. The public has been there, heard that. Sen. McCain should talk about what he knows -- fat Fannie and Freddie, farm-bill bloat, the ethanol subsidy fiasco, the federal procurement mess. Show people Gov. Palin's 18 single-spaced pages of 2007 vetoes. Then identify Congress's bipartisan supporters of the Legislative Line-Item Veto Act and ask the voters' support. Appear with GOP congressman from Sarah's new generation who want to help -- Eric Cantor of Virginia, Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, Kevin McCarthy of California. There are others.

Promise to spend the first two years on this historic political reform effort, and if a Democratic Congress laughs, promise to barnstorm in 2010 for a Congress willing to act, from any party.

One hears talk of John McCain's temper. My guess is voters want someone to lose it with Washington, big time. Oh, and he should ask what's the difference between a reformist pit bull and a six-term senator. It isn't lipstick.

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#10  No matter Obama's political origins, I don;t thinks he could have possibly had it any other way. You know, one of the reasons Italians formed an Italian mafia, was b/c they had no other way to survive. Irish - same. It all got cleaned up and laundered eventially, but . . .
Posted by: General_Comment   2008-09-18 23:55  

#9  O'Bamas corruption is really in a different class - namely Chicago machine politics. Aside from Rezko, which is small potatos in Chicagoland, Obama's career is wholly tied to Cook county machine - one party, one rule no matter how clean and articulate the package looks.

McCain and Palin have plenty to dsitinguish themselves from that, and even Sen. Biden (D-MBNA) is comparatively far more rounded.

As I foresee it, we'll learn all about Ayers and Rezko, along with Gov. Blag's and assorted others local pols, throughout late October.

Keep in mind that between them, Sen's Obama and Biden have had only one close election race, and that was Biden's first run in the early 70's. It will be interesting to see if a non-Clinton machine can hold it together nationally own the stretch, if it remains close.
Posted by: Halliburton - Asymmetrical Reply Division   2008-09-18 23:52  

#8  We may say that he "married up." Of course, the fact that McMansions technically belong to his wife, makes it legally distinguishable from his ownership. Buddy, you are right on that one.

One thing though, how come we so carefully splitting hair here, but God forbid we make meaninful distinctions in case of Obama?
Posted by: General_Comment   2008-09-18 23:41  

#7  whose family earned them by selling beer.
Posted by: General_Comment   2008-09-18 23:37  

#6  Actually, they belong to his wife, whose family earned them through work rather than speculation with other people's money.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-09-18 23:35  

#5  "Now the taxpayers are stuck with the bill while Obama and his advisors go home to their mansions."

A: I though it was McCane (pun) who had eight of them.
Posted by: General_Comment   2008-09-18 23:08  

#4  The One may be more corrupt than Biden.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-09-18 17:42  

#3  McCain needs to hammer the "culture of corrution and self-dealing". Given that 2 of Obama's closest advisors profited millions by running Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac into the ground, and OIbama was taking tons of money form their lobbyists, MCCain was trying to pass laws to regulate them better, and was stopped by - Harry Reid and Obama.

That's a very good big stiick with which to beat Obama, and he needs to hurry it up and put that out there, something along this theme:

WHile John McCain was trying to reform how Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae did their business, Barak Obama was taking large amounts of money form their lobbiests, and Obama, wiht Harry Reid and the Dem senta blocked these reforms. Now 2 former heads of these failed agencies, whoi profited with millions while americans are losign their homes, are now Obama's top advisors.

Obama's and his advisors profited, while McCain fought them in an attempt to reform. Now the taxpayers are stuck with the bill while Obama and his advisors go home to their mansions.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-09-18 17:13  

#2  Mainly knee deep in the Culture of Corruption(c). The pit pull hasn't had enough time to be bought.
Posted by Procopius2k


This is my main concern. I recall a freshman Congress (staring Fred) that was all full of piss and vinegar. Anyone recall what, if anything, they actually acomplished?

I'm all in favor of turning Sarahcuddah lose inside the beltway. I have some vague hopes that her faith as an Evangelical will keep her focused that God is indeed watching her and He doesn't compromise.

But people, all people, can be corrupted if you know what their price is. The only real question is does Washington have Sarah Palin's price? I don't think they do, they don't deal in that type of "currency".
Posted by: DLR   2008-09-18 16:44  

#1  Oh, and he should ask what's the difference between a reformist pit bull and a six-term senator.

Mainly knee deep in the Culture of Corruption(c). The pit pull hasn't had enough time to be bought.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-09-18 16:32  

00:00