You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Obama backs 'baby steps' taken by Bush against Pak
2008-09-16
(PTI) Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama has supported the cross-border raids by US forces into Pakistan but described them as "baby steps" by the Bush administration in the right direction. "Senator Obama has been saying for well over a year, in fact, has been saying frankly since before the invasion of Iraq that the central front in the war on terror is Afghanistan and Pakistan. And we need to invest there," Susan Rice, the top foreign policy adviser to Senator Obama, said.

"The Bush administration has come to that point of view. That's the kind of policy we have to pursue and continue, ...This is a baby step, but it's a baby step in the right direction and something that John McCain hasn't been willing to acknowledge," she said.

Senior officials of the administration have parried queries on attacks by American forces inside Pakistan that are supposedly signed by the President himself.

Rice said that President Bush and the administration was doing what Senator Obama believed in, saying invading Pakistan did not mean hurting the country's sovereignty but should be viewed as an act of self-defence.

"President Bush and the administration, indeed, are doing what Senator Obama said we must, well over a year ago. If we have actionable intelligence about a high-value terrorist target inside Pakistan and Pakistan is unwilling or unable to take that target out, such as Osama bin Laden, Senator Obama's view is we should act.

"Not to invade. Not to take over Pakistan's sovereignty, but to take out that target as an act of self-defence," Rice said.
Posted by:Fred

#11  I find myself wondering what his opinion is gonna be once it's him that's responsible for the outcome instead of GW Bush.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2008-09-16 23:40  

#10  How positively Nixonian of him. To me, this would be a great compliment, but Obamatons may regard it as a grave insult.
In particular, I wonder what his VC contingent; Ayers, Dohrn, and the Hollywood Grays; make of this willingness to attack enemy sanctuaries in another country. They weren't so pleased when Nixon did it in Cambodia.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2008-09-16 16:22  

#9  One has to wonder how Obama's erstwhile supporters on the Left are going to react, once it dawns on them that it means that war is going to last a whole lot longer.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-09-16 14:23  

#8  Lol! Whew! I gotta stop posting on hydrocodone!
Posted by: Mike N.   2008-09-16 09:02  

#7  And we need to invest there

Anyone else irritated by the use of that word?
Posted by: Raj   2008-09-16 08:06  

#6  Or humor?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-09-16 07:16  

#5  Thank you, A. Is this another example of
a "typo-lie," the incidental insertion of false information that can be dismissed as a simple error if it is challenged.? Or just simple mis-information?
Posted by: Bobby   2008-09-16 06:09  

#4  Mike, that was Susan Rice, not Condi Rice.
Posted by: A.ris.Katsaris   2008-09-16 05:04  

#3  Obama needs to realize that military actions are not necessarily required to be floated beforehand on the MSM.
Posted by: Alaska Paul in Glennallen, AK   2008-09-16 01:10  

#2  WTF? Who the hell is Condi working for?

Unless these raids into Pakistan turn into a bid shitstorm politically, this could help Bambis credibility.
Posted by: Mike N.   2008-09-16 00:31  

#1  Sounds very much like something the Sarahcuda said last week; something about defending ourselves and pre-emptive strikes. Or did I make that part up?
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2008-09-16 00:29  

00:00