You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Olde Tyme Religion
Muslim cabbies in Minn. lose round in court
2008-09-09
From Jihad Watch...
ST. PAUL, Minn. - Muslim cabbies whose religious beliefs go against driving passengers who carry alcohol have lost another round in Minnesota courts.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday against the cabbies' latest attempt to block penalties from being imposed when they refuse to transport passengers because they're carrying alcoholic beverages.

An ordinance adopted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission last year revokes a cabbie's license for 30 days for refusing to pick up a passenger for any reason at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. A second refusal brings a two-year revocation.

A large share of the cabbies who serve the airport are Somali Muslims, and many of them believe that Islamic law prohibits them from giving rides to people carrying alcohol. Since the commission began keeping track in 2002, there have been over 5,200 recorded instances of cabbies refusing service to passengers at the airport, including a "significant percentage" of passengers carrying alcohol, the appeals court noted.

The issue had simmered for several years before the commission decided the penalties were needed to ensure that customers would get reliable taxi service at the airport, and that compromises proposed by the drivers were impractical.

The drivers, who say the airport rules infringe on their religious freedom, appealed a lower court's refusal to grant a temporary injunction blocking those penalties from taking effect.

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision. The legal standard for granting a temporary injunction requires that the parties seeking it must show they would suffer irreparable harm if it's not granted. The appeals court agreed with the lower court that cab drivers who face suspension don't suffer irreparable harm because they can appeal their suspensions to the airports commission and keep working while their administrative appeals are pending
Posted by:tu3031

#6  Really, we don't.
Posted by: ex-lib   2008-09-09 19:17  

#5  Sure makes me want to get drunk, buy a few bottles of exceptional red wine, and ride in one of those cabs WITH MY DOG. This is America. If you don't like it, we really won't mind if you leave.
Posted by: ex-lib   2008-09-09 19:17  

#4  Hate to say it but if I was told I couldn't ride in a cab because of my booze I might be inclined to spill a bit into the cab. Let him deal with stale beer or vodka smells. Taliban trash.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-09-09 17:14  

#3  In a sane world, these guys have no case. I'm glad to see a sane judge in Minn. I expected less from Minn.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-09-09 16:36  

#2  nothing says you cannot go to the back of the line and wait / hope for a tea-toter, or at least somebody not packing (booze) to come along.

nothing also says you cannot just pack your sh!t and leave the country.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-09-09 15:54  

#1  Eat shit and die, you hyper-religious fucks. I would expect the same ruling against any religious group that tried to force their views on others. You don't like our culture and can't bring yourself to live next to it, please go back to that third-world shit-hole you came from.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-09-09 15:39  

00:00