You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Oprah's viewers unhappy with decision not to put Sarah Palin on the show
2008-09-06
Check out the comments thread at the "Oprah.com Community"--here's some samples:

Well, I am not surprised. As someone who HAD enjoyed everything Oprah for years I had become very disappointed in some of her decisions on the political front and this one is not exception.
You have Obama on not once but TWICE during this current race, openly campaigned for him on your show and we now have another "historical" candidate in this race and for this one you REFUSE to have HER on!
How very disappointing, how sexist, how very partisan and political on your part!
I sure hope you and your staff change your mind but I won't hold my breath.
All this decision does is reinforce my decision from a year or so ago to..
1) stop watching your show
2) stop "drinking the Oprah kool-aid" on all things in the world
3) stopped reading my Oprah magazine and when it was time to renew a year ago I did not. Each and every time I get a renewal form for it in the mail I not only not renew, I write a letter and give the exact reasons why I will NEVER renew the magazine!!!
How dissapointing you would choose YOUR personal political views on this race and YOUR candidate and not on this race as a whole....

Oprah, thank you so much for responding. I have watched your show, listened to your advice and benefitted from your giving Spirit over the years and I am heart sick that you are not going to have Sarah Palin on your show prior to the election. Everyone knows you are an Obama supporter and that is terrific for you (and for him), however, hasn't your message over the years been to raise women up to be the fullest, best person they can be? Was it all a lie? This is so hypocritical of you and I'm shocked at your position. In Marianne Williamson's book....she describes a President that is strong, honest, patriotic and true...and then she reveals that this President is a woman!! We ~we may very well be getting closer to that day and you are turning your back on it.
Please don't be afraid Oprah. Honor the present moment and be fair. It is not disloyal to have the other side on your show- it is Fair and with journalistic integrity to present all sides of an issue.
When you close your eyes...take a deep breath and ponder this situation, I pray your heart will lead you to do the right thing and practice what you have preached all these years.

"I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates." Is this a correct statement? I took it from your above statement. So if this is the case, why did you have Barack and Michelle on your show? Please don't say it was before he announced that he would run for President because I am sure that he had already made that decision. Just because he did not announce it to the public does not mean that he wasn't on that road. I am just disgusted at your statement. You most certainly used your show to platform the Obama's. Who do you think you are fooling? Nice Oprah. Way to be honest with your viewers.

While this is only my second posting, I've watched Oprah since the original book club began. I understand that she supports Senator Obama and that's been all right with me until now. Oprah has alway sought to inform women. Apparently she is afraid that informing us about Gov. Sarah Palin would be ill-advised. She doesn't trust us to make our own decisions. Now I'll have to find something else to tune the TV to when I'm cleaning house in between getting home from work myself and my family getting home.

To paraphrase a certain "spiritual mentor," Barack Obama's chickenssssssss are comin' home to roost.

h/t Jonah Goldberg @ National Review
Posted by:Mike

#17  I was just over there - 2100++ comments
Posted by: anonymous2u   2008-09-06 22:45  

#16  As someone else said, I'm glad I have a day job.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2008-09-06 19:30  

#15  all those shows make me ill: Oprah, Dr. Phil, Dr. Laura on radio, et al...
Posted by: Frank G   2008-09-06 19:21  

#14  Someone needs to come up with an alternate to Oprah pronto.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-09-06 19:20  

#13  "the name was "David Duke""

I know. That's what I thought I typed! (I have the darnedest lapses. I've had a stroke; that's the "funny walks" part)
Posted by: Minister of funny walks   2008-09-06 19:10  

#12  What's 2nd of all?
Posted by: .5MT   2008-09-06 18:20  

#11  happy ex-husbands?
Posted by: Frank G   2008-09-06 18:18  

#10  Isn't her show on in the afternoons?

Even if I wanted to watch it - which I DON'T - I couldn't. I work for a living.

Who the hell are all these women who have time to watch TV in the afternoon (or anytime else, for that matter). Where do they get their income?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-09-06 17:47  

#9  Oprah who?
Posted by: A_Rovian_Desciple   2008-09-06 17:40  

#8  "Please don't be afraid Oprah."

ouch. that's gotta hurt....
Posted by: Shomoper Dark Lord of the Faith9731   2008-09-06 17:31  

#7  Ditto Betty! She's the absolute, undisputed Queen of the Cult of Victimization.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-09-06 17:27  

#6  I'm not surprised that Oprah refuses to host Sarah. Her entire show is based on victimhood. Oh lookie, today for our guest we have another object of pity. Don't we all feel better about ourselves now?

Sarah just doesn't fit that mold. Oprah wouldn't know what to do with her.
Posted by: Betty Grating2215   2008-09-06 17:19  

#5  First of all the name was "David Duke"
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-09-06 17:07  

#4  I never listened to Oprah to begin with. Of cource, I never listened to Davis Duke either.
Posted by: Minister of funny walks   2008-09-06 16:57  

#3  Oprah is a hypocritical, racist, self centered bitch.
The faster her show dies, the happier I will be.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-09-06 16:43  

#2  Quite frankly, I'm delighted with Oprah's decision. Clearly showcases her hypocrisy. I don't think Palin would have accepted anyway.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-09-06 16:42  

#1  Wait a minuet, I thought Jonah thought this was no big deal? If it isn't why keep writing about it?
Posted by: Jefferson   2008-09-06 16:07  

00:00