You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
U.N. Chief: Efforts to Reform Have Failed
2008-09-05
Johnson! Stop the presses!!
UNITED NATIONS -- U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon decried turf wars in the global organization during a private speech in which he also acknowledged bluntly that his first 20 months in office have been a failure.
So I guess I'll just skate through the next four years like everybody else did...
Ban labeled the organization a "huge bureaucracy," according to a transcript Newsmax obtained of the speech he delivered to senior staffers at an annual closed conclave during the weekend in Turin, Italy.
UN "huge bureaucracy". Film at eleven...
That bureaucracy indicates that U.S. efforts to reform the United Nations, starting with then-U.S. Ambassador Madeleine K. Albright and continuing through six U.S. representatives spanning more than 16 years, have come up short.
Oh. So it's not the UN's fault of course...
"We must admit this. ... We must acknowledge how resistant we are to change. It cripples us in our most important job to function as a team. ... Here at the UN, unfortunately, I see people too often putting their own interests first. ... I see too many turf fights, too much intramural wrangling, too much protectiveness of the status quo," the U.N. chief said.
Damn straight, Ban Man. Waiter, more wine.
"I see little evidence of a change in mindset," he said. "We get too bogged down in internal or bureaucratic technicalities. We waste incredible amounts of time on largely meaningless matters."
Waiter, could I get some more shrimp. And would it be too much trouble to make sure it's cold this time.
The staff's task is to change the U.N. to change the world, Ban said, adding, " This is the big picture. I am frustrated by our failure so often to see it. ... Department heads squabble among themselves over posts and budgets and bureaucratic prerogatives, as though they owned them. But our departments, agencies and programs are not personal fiefdoms."
Might as well burn it down and collect the insurance...
The secretary-general also acknowledged what has been whispered in the halls of the U.N.'s New York City headquarters: He has not gained the trust of the organization's rank and file. "I tried to lead by example. Nobody followed."
Well ain't that a kick in the ass, huh, Ban Man?
Ban's address lent credence to what many inside the world body have been talking about for almost a year, that electing the former South Korean foreign minister in 2006 was a mistake.
So he'll resign, of course, right? Right?
Many veteran diplomats often complained that Ban simply did not know how the U.N. operated. Others raised questions of competency when a veteran U.N. staffer, Angela Kane of Germany recently was promoted to a key post as undersecretary-general for management. The promotion came despite the fact that investigators with the U.N.'s Office of Internal Oversight Services severely criticized her previous performances. The elevation raised eyebrows among U.N. staffers.
Sounds perfect for the job to me...
The Kane appointment is just one decision on a long list of what many inside the organization have questioned. Echoing the internal criticism are several diplomats, including those from the United States who were instrumental in getting the South Korean elected. And U.S. State Department officials privately wonder whether Ban has enough support to seek a second five-year term in 2112.
Still, that's four more years on the gravy train, Ban Man...
Ban's troubles come during the first stage of the U.N.'s five-year renovation project to rehabilitate its headquarters. The so-called Capital Master Plan, begun in May with a projected cost of $2 billion, is said to be more than $200 million over budget.
Geez, that's all? I'd consider that progress.
Posted by:tu3031

#5  I'm willing to pay for it IF they move to the Sudan.

Better yet - put it in Israel - getting bombed may clear their heads.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2008-09-05 20:46  

#4  Here at the UN, unfortunately, I see people too often putting their own interests first. ..

Too bad he's a babbling idiot.
Posted by: Ebbatch Scourge of the Faith7719   2008-09-05 17:49  

#3  Most honest statement I've heard out of the UN, maybe forever. Am I brave enough to believe that there may be more coming? Nah.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-09-05 15:13  

#2  Took him 20 months to figure that out? Well, at least he's forthright and honest.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-09-05 13:56  

#1  Well, I could suggest something that would help them reform - have the US cut off all funding. They can keep the current building if they want to, but any new building must be built elsewhere on somebody else's dime. Preferably someplace like Khartoum, Sudan.
Of course, if Bambi gets elected, we will instead double our contribution and build them a new building for free.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-09-05 13:47  

00:00