| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| Who wants Cold War II? |
| 2008-09-04 |
| Does the war in the Caucasus herald the coming of Cold War II? Or is it a Russian invitation to the West to reshape the global status quo that has prevailed since the end of Cold War I? Russia’s military is certainly not fit for a global confrontation with the West. Not only did Russian intelligence fail to catch the coming Georgian attack on South Ossetia, but Russia’s electronic warfare system and ill-equipped ground troops looked like outdated Soviet-era relics. Then again, a war does not have to display state-of-the-art weaponry to convey a powerful political message. After all, the US’ global leverage is dwindling even as its army remains the most sophisticated military machine in history. By showing that the US has lost its monopoly on the unilateral use of force and by invading a US ally — which even the Soviet Union never dared — Russia blatantly challenged the Pax Americana that emerged from the US victory in the Cold War. The war in Georgia could not have happened if the US had not mishandled its global hegemony so disastrously. The US entered a calamitous war in Iraq, missed more than one opportunity to engage Iran’s revolutionary regime, pushed for unending expansion of NATO onto the doorstep of Russia and haughtily ignored Russia’s protests against the deployment of missile defenses in Eastern Europe. Under the cover of the “war on terror,” the US played into Russia’s fear of encirclement through its military penetration into Central Asian countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan. In its quest to counter what it sees as a hostile US strategy of creating American “Cubas” on its doorstep, the Kremlin is promoting alliances with Raul Castro’s Cuba and Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. In the Middle East, Russia is doing everything to regain some of the footholds it had in the past with the aim of sidelining the US as the sole global actor in the region. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s recent visit to Moscow is a transparent manifestation of the potential for a renewed alliance. Russia continues to place hurdles before the US proposals for sanctions on Iran, has signed with it lavish energy contracts and is about to sell it advanced aerial systems aimed at thwarting a possible Israeli or US attack. Likewise, the Russians have just erased much of Iraq’s debt and agreed to lucrative oil drilling deals. One victim of the US’ post-Cold War unilateralism has been the transatlantic alliance. The US drive to expand NATO is not shared by all its allies, and Europe is in no mood to follow in the footsteps of Georgia’s impulsive president and be dragged by the ex-Soviet Baltic states and Poland into a confrontation with Russia. Europe, dependent as it is on Russian energy supplies, is not prepared for a new Cold War, and its alternative to Russian oil — Iran — is not palatable to the Americans. A return to a Cold War strategy is clearly not in the West’s interest. Threats to expel Russia from the G8 or keep it out of the WTO will only increase its sense of isolation, strengthen its authoritarianism and push it into the role of a revolutionary anti-status quo power in the Soviet Union’s old sphere of influence and beyond. Russian minorities still waiting to be “redeemed” in Ukraine, the Baltic states and Moldova are potential triggers for Russia’s neo-imperialism. But, as a power burdened with too many domestic ills and a chronic sense of insecurity along its vast and dangerously depopulated borders, Russia cannot be interested in a Cold War II, either. Its recent agreement with China on border demarcation notwithstanding, Russia can never be assured of China’s ultimate intentions as a colossal power hungry for raw materials for its booming economy and living space for its massive population. As the war in the Caucasus has shown, the global economy does not offer a foolproof guarantee against war. But it is one thing to take a calculated risk, as the Russians did in rightly assuming that the West would not go to war over Georgia; it is another thing for Russia to jeopardize its colossal economic gains of recent years in an all-out confrontation with the West. Indeed, the war in Georgia has already thrown Russia into the most severe financial crisis since its virtual bankruptcy in 1998; it lost US$17 billion in capital flight in just one week. The Moscow stock exchange lost 15 percent of its value last month, and Russia’s central bank forecasts a 25 percent decline in foreign investment this year. Russia must seek genuine strategic partnership with the US and the latter must understand that, when excluded and despised, Russia can be a major global spoiler. Ignored and humiliated by the US since the Cold War ended, Russia needs integration into a new global order that respects its interests as a resurgent power, not an anti-Western strategy of confrontation. Shlomo Ben-Ami is a former Israeli foreign minister who now serves as the vice president of the Toledo International Center for Peace in Spain. |
| Posted by:Flaique Slomoper5755 |
| #13 INTERFAX > IRAN PROTESTS LAYING OF PIPLEINES ACROSS THE CASPIAN SEA. This is more MSM-NET evidence that ANTI-US/NATO ANGRY RUSSIA IS COVERTLY MORE SCARED OF NUCLEAR IRAN/ISLAMISM [Center of Russia], + ACTUALLY DESIRES THE US-NATO/EU TO SET UP VIABLE MIL PRESENCE ALL OVER ITS PERIPHERY. RUSSIA > "D *** NG IT, IFF THE US-NATO/EU WON'T HELP ME PROTECT MYSELF AGZ MY OWN ANTI-US ALLY NUCLEAR IRAN/ISLAM, I'LL NUKE THE WORLD, D *** YOU, INTO GLOW-IN-THE-DARK SMITHEREENIES, AND DON'T YOUSE ever Ever EVER E-V-E-R EEEVVVVEEEEERRRRRR EVVVVAAAAHHHHH FORGET WHAT I NEVER TOLD YOU"! 2008-2012 [2016] > SITZKRIEG??? IMO IRAN will be "pushing the envelope" agz the US + ISRAEL iff it fails to unilater conduct a formal nuke test(s). 9-11/WOT > RADICAL ISLAM = IRAN IS WAGING ITS JIHAD TO VALIDATE ITSELF, PRECLUDE USSR-STYLE IMPLOSION, + TRANSFORM INTO A PAN-DIMENSIONAL GLOBAL FORCE ON PAR [iff not SUPERIOR] VV US-WEST + JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY, NOT TO REMAIN IN MINOR/LESSOR STATUS. RADICAL ISLAM > IS NOT ABSOLUT DEFEATED, BUT NEITHER HAS IT ACHIEVED PARITY = SUPERIORITY EITHER. *AN "ANGRY RUSSIA" IS AS MUCH A PROB FOR NUKE-+ OWG CALIPHATE-AMBITIOUS RADICAL ISLAM AS FOR THE US-ALLIES. It again shows why, despite any rhetoric to the contray, NO CAMP OR SIDE DESIRES "ARMISTICE", "STATUS QUO", "DETENTE" OR "MUTUAL CO-EXISTENCE", ETC. UNLESS I'VE MISSED SOMETHING, RADICAL ISLAM WILL NOT ACCEPT BEING SECOND-TIER TO THE US-ALLIES NOR RUSSIA NOR ANY "MODERATE" = "NON-ALIGNED" POWERS. On another note, BOTH THE US + RUSSIA, etc. HAVE PROCLAIMED THERE CAN BE "NO RETURN TO THE COLD WAR" [BIPOLAR NUC DETENTE + CO-EXISTENCE + MAD] - what more a return to a COLD WAR II or even III??? IOW, there can be no "COLD WAR II" BECUZ THE US-ALLIES, ANGRY RUSSIA, + RADICAL ISLAM DON'T WANT ONE! |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-09-04 22:50 |
| #12 the unilateral use of force and by invading a US ally -- which even the Soviet Union never dared -- Nah - they just invaded themselves in 56 and 68. |
| Posted by: anonymous2u 2008-09-04 20:54 |
| #11 Who wants Cold War II? Just remember the words of Captain John Parker uttered on the morning of April 19, 1775. Tradition reports his order at Lexington Green to be "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-09-04 20:40 |
| #10 So you do it gratuitously? tsk tsk |
| Posted by: lotp 2008-09-04 18:51 |
| #9 The OSCE is nobody's puppet. President Bush will take notice of their report. Captured infantry from Georgia's Telavi Barracks have admitted that the infiltration to the zone from where Saakashvili ordered a 6.5 hour barrage, began while he was on state television offering autonomy to South Ossetia. Within 10 hours half of SO's population was in exile. We don't need to lie to support peace and security. |
| Posted by: Regional Peace 2008-09-04 18:27 |
| #8 Of course they'll blame Georgia, they can't very well blame their Russian overlords now can they? |
| Posted by: AzCat 2008-09-04 17:36 |
| #7 Old military technology? Not anymore. Russian blogs are reporting that Russian troops captured the most sophisticated American and Israeli technology, during the intervention. And who started that war? The 9 Monitors of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) will be issuing their report shortly. Der Spiegel claims they will blame Georgia. |
| Posted by: Regional Peace 2008-09-04 16:28 |
| #6 Not only did Russian intelligence fail to catch the coming Georgian attack on South Ossetia Maybe my memory is faulty here, but I seem to recall reports that said 'not exactly'. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2008-09-04 14:55 |
| #5 And if it comes to war, the Euros should welcome another Cold War - considering where the last two hot wars were fought. Do they honestly think it would be any different this time? Do they think the Russians would cross the Bering Straight or something? |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-04 13:44 |
| #4 What Barbara said. Better a few generations of regional proxy wars than a few years of the global kind. |
| Posted by: AzCat 2008-09-04 13:38 |
| #3 "Who wants Cold War II?" I'll take Cold War II over |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-04 13:32 |
| #2 Well goodness. It seems I should crawl into a hole, pull it in after me, and hope nobody sees the lump I make under the rug. Vice president of the Toledo International Center for Peace in Spain? The kind of authority born to be believed! |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-09-04 13:27 |
| #1 As I recall the "Cold War" was a time of unparalled growth, new electronics every other day (It seemed) and prosperity. I vote YES for "Cold War II. We badly need another growth spurt. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2008-09-04 13:26 |