| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| U.S. Navy Ships Head to Georgia |
| 2008-08-21 |
| Two U.S. Navy ships, including a guided missile destroyer USS McFaul, and a U.S. Coast Guard cutter are getting underway to transport humanitarian assistance supplies to Georgia, U.S. European Command (EUCOM) said on August 21. It said USS McFaul (DDG 74) departed from Souda Bay, Crete, on Wednesday and the cutter Dallas (WHEC 716) will depart later this week. McFaul and Dallas are scheduled to transit into the Black Sea and arrive in Georgia within a week, according to the U.S. European Command. The announcement comes after it was reported that Turkey gave its go-ahead to sail through its straits into the Black Sea. "The ships will transport thousands of blankets, hygiene items, baby food and infant supplies to save lives and alleviate human suffering," U.S. European Command said. Meanwhile, a team of U.S. European Command, led by Army Brig. Gen. John Miller, is already in Tbilisi "to assess the current humanitarian situation and make recommendations on continued humanitarian support to senior military leadership." "The EUCOM team will conduct a deliberate and focused assessment, encompassing variables such as transportation, infrastructure, manpower and many other life support considerations," the U.S. European Command said. |
| Posted by:Spike Uniter |
| #38 It can carry the Marines, but they are not on board. Not to say they couldn't fly in a couple of light Marine rifle companies for "port security" and base them out of that ship. Heard the "Mercy" is on the way as well, hospital ship. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2008-08-21 22:00 |
| #37 Sorry...I meant Rambler not Jorong Barnsmell6594. |
| Posted by: anymouse 2008-08-21 21:44 |
| #36 Hey OS...I have been on the Blue Ridge and Coronado. The JOC on the Blue Ridge is so cold you need arctic gear to survive. Agree that Mount Whitney is making a statement as the 6th Fleet command ship. Jorong Barnsmell6594...No Gyrenes to my knowledge. Only on LPH and LHDs |
| Posted by: anymouse 2008-08-21 21:43 |
| #35 LCC 20 Mount Whitney nfo http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/lcc-20.htm |
| Posted by: linkere Nebraskans2237 2008-08-21 20:51 |
| #34 The Mt Whitney can also embark Marines, I believe. I don't know if they have any aboard right now. (Other than staff elements.) |
| Posted by: Rambler in California 2008-08-21 20:40 |
| #33 If the Russians try to board a US Ship, I am sure we will see the first use of a Laser Guided 1000 pound JDAM hit a Russian boarding ship aimed from a Stealth fighter over head. 2000 pound JDAM hitting the boarding party's boat would, yeah, be asking a bit too much, I reckon. |
| Posted by: Jorong Barnsmell6594 2008-08-21 20:24 |
| #32 Poor Russia was so keen on demonstrating U.S. powerlessness to support WOT allies. Unintended consequences indeed. In the meantime, both Israeli and American Jewish refugee aid societies are working to help those driven out by the Russians, in addition to the American Air Force. Perhaps America flew them in, I don't know. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-08-21 20:10 |
| #31 The LCC's "threat" is simply providing a politically unattackble airfield, C4I center, and logistics point. Plus the large flat deck, refueling, etc provide massive amounts of tactical mobility, and combined with strategic sealift and airlift, its enought to force the Russians into a corner where they either must roll back, or deliberately attack a lightly armed ship (or its auxilliaries like helicopters) on a mission of mercy. Being able to bypass Russian roadblocks, deliver food, water, medical supplies, etc, any place we want to is a huge thumb in the eye of the occupiers. This is one time when "beans" could carry a lot larger impact than bullets. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2008-08-21 19:57 |
| #30 Remember what they did to Savannah in '64! |
| Posted by: borgboy 2008-08-21 19:31 |
| #29 I wonder if the Ukrainians want to semi-permanently host a rotating NATO flotilla in Odessa Another outcome due to the application of the rule of unintended consequences. |
| Posted by: gorb 2008-08-21 19:30 |
| #28 Agree with OS on the Mt Whitney. But it is a command and control ship with limited firepower. |
| Posted by: anymouse 2008-08-21 18:56 |
| #27 Been on a WHEC. They have no ASW, and limited Anti-Air and Anti-missile capability. The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are very capable, but not outside of the Strike Group. |
| Posted by: anymouse 2008-08-21 18:53 |
| #26 The senior faculty at Rantburg University are earning their suede elbow patches today for sure. Thanks for the ejamacashun! Very informative. |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2008-08-21 18:49 |
| #25 The Mount Whitney is quite a sniffer to have in the area. Plus it has huge amount of helicopters it can run off the decks for bypassing Russian roadblocks of ground-based supply deliveries. The cutter Dallas is there clearly for port operations. Coasties excel at that sort of thing, and given that Poti has been utterly trashed by the I wonder if the Ukrainians want to semi-permanently host a rotating NATO flotilla in Odessa... hmm. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2008-08-21 18:38 |
| #24 sorry for double post missed #11 |
| Posted by: linker 2008-08-21 18:12 |
| #23 Besides theses ships there is this 'Spain's SPS Adm. Juan de Bourbon, Germany's FGS Luebeck and the Polish ship ORP General K Pulaski. Romanian and Bulgarian ships will join them for exercises during a three-week deployment' from this crosslink http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=247834&D=2008-08-21&SO=&HC=3 |
| Posted by: linker 2008-08-21 18:11 |
| #22 1) No Rusia&n captain will ever take the initiative of borading the US ships. No unless he wants to end in Gulag: this would mean war and captains are not allowed to start wars. 2) Ditto for Russian admirals 3) Only Puttin can give the order and he knows the risks. |
| Posted by: JFM 2008-08-21 17:09 |
| #21 ...but at sea, they are safe as houses. Safe as houses in a F5? Sorry had to be a smart ass... Anyway, the Russians would only board the US ships to show they are willing to go to the hilt and war over Georgia. I expect the ships to be harassed, shadowed, overflown, buzzed, etc. the entire time they are in the Black Sea. If they do try to board them, I expect to see 3 Russian armored columns punch into Georgia proper for conquest. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2008-08-21 16:58 |
| #20 Seems to me that: 1) the ships serve as a "don't go there" line for Vlad 2) the ships do indeed bring some humanitarian supplies so that we're not lying through out teeth 3) The Whitney turns her ears onto all the Rooskies are doing, passing all the info back to the Pentagon, and passing some to the Georgians 4) The McFaul protects the Whitney 5) The Dallas is there for odd jobs and burnishes the humanitarian angle |
| Posted by: Steve White 2008-08-21 16:55 |
| #19 There is not going to be any ship boarding for lots of reasons. To start with, the Russians have zero, nil, no authority in that no war has been declared. No Russian captain in his right mind, or even roaring drunk, is going to try that one on. Second, US ships are US territory. Stepping on a US ship without authorization is an act of war at worst, and piracy at best. If a Russian ships captain and his staff are invited over, it will be for a dinner in the boardroom, and they will wear their dress uniforms. And forced boarding, I might add, would also be suicidal. Do you think we are just sending in surface ships? Each LA class attack sub packs about 26 Mark-48 torpedoes and Harpoons in some combination. "Here be monsters" should be their motto. Once they land in port, it will be a different situation altogether, but at sea, they are safe as houses. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2008-08-21 16:35 |
| #18 Why should the Russians board US Navy ships? They will be in international or Georgian waters. I would think that boarding a warship like that would be considered an act of war. And stealing humanitarian supplies is at best an act of piracy and at worst an act of war. |
| Posted by: Rambler in California 2008-08-21 16:28 |
| #17 Not only will the Russians board the ships but they will end up stealing the humanitarian supplies being delivered. I don't agree with this at all - would rather see an airlift type response. This may end up being a mockery and nothing we can do about it. |
| Posted by: Jack is Back! 2008-08-21 16:05 |
| #16 USS Mt Whitney is a command and control ship. Ie it has reduced armmant and enhanced communication gear and sensors compared to a normal ship. In other words she is ideal to learn about Russian forces movements and capabilities. |
| Posted by: JFM 2008-08-21 15:55 |
| #15 Looks like a humanitarian mission to me. The ships are non-threatening, and the Whitney is going to be there just to carry supplies. The Russians might board the ships, but I don't think they'd attack them. |
| Posted by: gorb 2008-08-21 15:21 |
| #14 Turkey's foreign ministry said Germany Finally. |
| Posted by: liberalhawk 2008-08-21 14:24 |
| #13 Very interesting, Pappy. |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2008-08-21 14:21 |
| #12 Hmmmm... Here's the unclass info on the Whitney |
| Posted by: Pappy 2008-08-21 13:54 |
| #11 The AP is reporting that the third US ship to transit the Turkish Straits is the USS Mount Whitney . In addition, according to the AP: Turkey's foreign ministry said Germany, Poland and Spain also have notified the Turkish government that they are sending humanitarian aid aboard navy ships to Georgia via the Turkish Straits. LINK |
| Posted by: mrp 2008-08-21 13:45 |
| #10 This is a measured response dictated by the situation on the ground. We don't want to get into a shooting war with the Russians. They are all atwitter right now and so undo provocation, however satisfying, is not needed. But the presence of two US warships sends a signal nevertheless. Russia certainly doesn't want a shooting war either. These guys are a trip wire/line in the sand that the Russians know they can't cross. They will gnash teeth, they will take out their frustrations on the Georgians, unfortunately, but they won't do anything to our ships. |
| Posted by: remoteman 2008-08-21 13:07 |
| #9 I don't think these ships are any kind of "Battle Group". Their announced purpose is to deliver humanitarian supplies, although an auxiliary cargo ship would have a lot more capacity. |
| Posted by: Rambler in California 2008-08-21 13:01 |
| #8 So is it 2 or 3 ships? only two are named, one USN and one USCG. maybe the third is dreamed of SSN (dreamed about here a coule days ago). And the Cutter doesn't have nearly the firepower the DDG does; seems like a half baked response. but better than no response. i guess. |
| Posted by: USN, Ret. 2008-08-21 12:56 |
| #7 In a "theoritical" fight how much of a chance would these two ships have against the aging Russian Black Sea Fleet? None. |
| Posted by: JFM 2008-08-21 12:31 |
| #6 That's a whole lot of SM-2s off the beach. I think coming in with the Battle Ensigns waving in the breeze would be a nice touch :) |
| Posted by: mrp 2008-08-21 12:23 |
| #5 In a "theoritical" fight how much of a chance would these two ships have against the aging Russian Black Sea Fleet? I don't think there will be any kind of fight, but I'm curious of our chances if the Russians decide our ships need to be "inspected". |
| Posted by: Charles 2008-08-21 12:20 |
| #4 From Haaretz Flash: 18:35 Hamas voices support for Russian military operation in Georgia (DPA) GMT+1 Nor really relevant to the article but interesting nonetheless. |
| Posted by: Col B. Guano (ret.) 2008-08-21 12:07 |
| #3 Hmmm ... a US Army flag officer in Tblisi. Heh. |
| Posted by: mrp 2008-08-21 11:39 |
| #2 Sweeeet... |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2008-08-21 11:03 |
| #1 The announcement comes after it was reported that Turkey gave its go-ahead to sail through its straits into the Black Sea. ;) |
| Posted by: liberalhawk 2008-08-21 10:58 |