You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Dakato windfarm's size limited to 180 MW because tranmission lines not big enough.
2008-08-13
Posted by:3dc

#12  tipover, my father knows a company rep in Sacramento that tells him that it is a break even business, in a good year. The other 4 out of 5 years it is a subsidy situation.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-08-13 18:43  

#11  Make hydrogen from splitting water with any spare power.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-08-13 18:08  

#10  Does it even take a college freshman to tell them that if they double the voltage in their lines it will cut the amps in half? Then they could use very, very small lines if they wanted. P=I*V or if you need it V=I*R. There you go, now off to work.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-08-13 17:14  

#9  tip

wont that depend on energy prices at the time?
Posted by: supergalitz   2008-08-13 16:45  

#8  3dc, you put the windmills where you need the power.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-08-13 16:44  

#7  PR piece for the wind farm. Be interesting to see what they have to say in 3-5 years, after the warts are exposed. Can these operations survive without federal handouts?
Posted by: tipover   2008-08-13 15:54  

#6  Shale in ND.
Posted by: 3dc   2008-08-13 15:43  

#5  AS has the right idea. We should be using wind power for off-grid applications that don't need on demand power. Two occur to me - desalination and heating shale oil deposits.

You need to talk to a chemical engineer, but the Haber process looks to me like it requires a continuous process, ie a continous power supply, which wind isn't.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-08-13 15:30  

#4  AS - an interesting idea!
Posted by: 3dc   2008-08-13 15:06  

#3  The problem is that wind turbines only produce between 10% and 20% of their capacity, but you need the infrastructure to support the rare occasions when they produce at peak capacity. So you need to build 5 to 10 times more transmission capacity. Which is why even if wind made economic sense at the point of generation, it's still a bad idea.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-08-13 14:07  

#2  I have a business idea that I need to flesh out.

Could power sources in this situation be used to make fertilizer? How small could you shrink the Haber process?
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2008-08-13 13:56  

#1  Billions for earmarks and not a penny for needed infrastructure.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-08-13 13:08  

00:00