| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Democrats Shrug Off Edwards' Affair, Paternity Questions |
| 2008-08-11 |
|
| Posted by:Fred |
| #8 The Dems should be really pissed at Edward's because this could have blown up really bad if it came out later in the campaign. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2008-08-11 12:17 |
| #7 As long as Ms Hunter declares the payments to her on her income tax and the Edwards campaign and supporters declare their payment, I don't see what the legal problem would be. On the other hand, it would be cool to see what the 1099-MISC forms say and whether tax was witheld. |
| Posted by: mhw 2008-08-11 10:33 |
| #6 C'mon, everybody. Let's MoveOn.org. |
| Posted by: treo 2008-08-11 10:06 |
| #5 However, innuendo about McCain and a staffer are worthy of NYT front page coverage. No toe tapping about it. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-08-11 09:12 |
| #4 US Justice Department, please follow the money paid to Ms. Hunter. I think we'd ALL like to know the real source of her recent income. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2008-08-11 08:24 |
| #3 They really have achieved moral bankruptcy this time. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2008-08-11 08:19 |
| #2 Its not like touching shoes in a toliet or sending suggestive emails to pages or anything like that, you know. Its real sex, adulterous sex, semi-public sex, tabloid sex. Do you think I would have sex with someone with cancer? Yukkky! |
| Posted by: Jack is Back! 2008-08-11 04:42 |
| #1 One set of morals for me, and another set of morals for thee. |
| Posted by: gorb 2008-08-11 02:10 |