You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Topless animal rights activists protest outside British embassy
2008-07-16
Animal rights activists protest outside the British embassy in Riga July 15, 2008, against the use of bear skin used to make hats worn by the British army's household regiment.
Posted by:Fred

#11  ...Little known but true fact: Most of those hats (and those worn by the various other regiments and bands) are about 100 years old.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2008-07-16 20:53  

#10  Well, I would be interested in seeing them protest in January or February rather than July - going topless then in Latvia takes real courage.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-07-16 20:40  

#9  Personally I hope they do a round the world protest at every British Embassy. I'll can't wait for them to get to San Diego.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-07-16 20:19  

#8  Compare wid REDDIT [old?] > seems US PETA 's put three of 'em in cages, with pics. ARTIC ALSO HAS LINK TO 15 CELEB WOMEN WHOM WENT NUDE FOR PETA = ANIMAL RIGHTS.

NET Poster > Whaddaya know, PETA has finally discovered Marketing and, HORROR OF HORRORS FOR THE LEFT, ITS WORKING FOR THEM!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-16 18:53  

#7  Ah yes, the protest perfunctory topless display. The protest use of "bare skin" to protest the use of "bear skin." Oh, never mind. Does anyone really take this sort of thing seriously? The "boobs not bombs" posting made one want to escape to somewhere else quickly.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-07-16 16:28  

#6  Two points. (1) It's nice to see naked protesters that don't burn your eyes. (2) They use a lot of fur clothing in nearby Russia so why are the Latvian's targeting the British? I mean how often do they need to replace the bear hats anyway? And how many hats per bear? I should think that if a beer dies in the London zoo they'd have enough fur for a decades worth of new hats and no harm done, while in Russia they kill lots of little animals to create big furcoats (which keep you from freezing to death but I'm trying to think like a protester a bit here).
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-07-16 12:31  

#5  They sure beat the hell out of Boobs Not Bombs.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-07-16 11:53  

#4  Move along now. No boobs to see here. Just keep moving.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-07-16 09:14  

#3  ...against the use of bear skin...

"Roight! We will no longer be using bear skin for our 'ats. From now on, we will be using...bare skin. It's 'arvesting time, lads!"
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2008-07-16 08:01  

#2  Sigh - back to biz.

WORLDNEWS > ARMAGEDDON BRITAIN: A DETAILED INSIGHT INTO HOW A MAJOR CATASTROPHIC TERROR ATTACK [espec Nukular?] CAN OCCUR IN BRITAIN ANY DAY WITH LITTLE OR NO WARNING, via Private Jets and other Light Aircraft in manned Suicide? HIGH GLOBAL-VISIBILITY/PROFILE OPERS.

ALso from WORLDNEWS > USA:PREPARING FOR THE UNTHINKABLE - NUCLEAR ATTACK [Terror].

And not just a 10-kiloton'er boom anymore???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-16 01:54  

#1  Of course you know this thread is useless widout MORE Babe pics!

GOD BLESS YOU BENNY, MONTY, and RUMPOLE!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-16 01:47  

00:00