You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
5th Fleet ORBAT
2008-07-14
Posted by:3dc

#10  Compare wid WAFF.com Poster Threads > USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN MOVES TO NEAR PAKISTANI COAST, US SPECIAL FORCES PREPARE TO CONDUCT OPERATION INSID + US WOULD INVADE PAKISTAN TO ELIMINATE TERROR CELLS.

Also from WAFF.com >INDIA > MAOISTS HITTING INDIAN ECONOMY [encircling Urban Areas] + INDIA IS FAILING AS A STATE.

*STARS-N-STRIPES [old] > [IIRC] USN CARRIER BATTLE GROUP [USS Ronald Reagan = "Ronnie/Mighty Ron"] MOVES TO NEAR KOREAS/KOREAN COASTS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-14 19:53  

#9  Right, OS. The Iranian response will be against oil production, not a military target. Mines and surface attacks against oil tankers will be their 'revenge' and final peep.
All we need is a president with cojones.
Posted by: wxjames   2008-07-14 12:04  

#8  Note the 4 US MCM ships. Iranian naval mines are a huge threat, and probably more of a threat than the missiles in terms of shutting down oil traffic in the persian gulf
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-07-14 10:49  

#7  Also interesting to see FGS Emden in the order of battle. The original light cruiser SMS Emden had quite a legendary career in the Indian Ocean.
Posted by: Mike   2008-07-14 10:42  

#6  Free Balochistan from the Persians?

I wonder if the Arab World (especially the Emirates and Qatar, etc) would want to add another Arab emirate, sitting in Bandar Abbas and the surrounding region? After all, the area is ethnically Arab.

Start an uprising there, via supply from Afghanistan. Use the Kurds in the north to distract the Mullahs while this is being set up.


Posted by: OldSpook   2008-07-14 10:24  

#5  I am glad to see the USS Momsen in that number. "Swede" Momsen was a true US Navy hero:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Momsen

He was also shafted by the Roosevelt-era War Department for proving them wrong for fielding a defective torpedo, they refused to admit was defective.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-07-14 09:42  

#4  Bookmarked the blog. Thanks W. Also a Mrs. Davis sighting there in the comments.
Posted by: .5MT   2008-07-14 08:45  

#3  A lot of landing craft in that group.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-07-14 08:08  

#2  Escalation scenarios are running amok. The Ayatollahs brag both about having mobile missile launch capacity, and their ability to hit targets at long range. That mentality serves only to feed a pretext to the other side. Where there is mobility, targeting has to be over a wide range. In GW1, anti-missile work was search and destroy; that's not easy when the launcher can be parked in a building. Long range capacity manifests civilian targeting.

Hmmm. We have to protect women and children. Ergo enemy life has the moral value of cockroaches; launch capacity has to be terminated by any necessary means.

Truman did the same math in 1945.

The British Navy held the Strait of Hormuz during much of the 18th and 19th centuries. The north bank must be made an American Gibraltar.

Posted by: McZoid   2008-07-14 04:38  

#1  Looks ready to do some serious hurt...
Posted by: Ptah   2008-07-14 04:34  

00:00