You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Administration Rejects Regulating Greenhouse Gases
2008-07-12
The Bush administration on Friday rejected regulating greenhouse gases blamed for global warming, saying it would damage the U.S. economy and cause too many job losses.

In a 588-page federal notice, the Environmental Protection Agency made no finding on whether global warming poses a threat to people's health, reversing an earlier conclusion at the insistence of the White House and officially kicking any decision on a solution to the next president and Congress.

The White House on Thursday rejected EPA's conclusion three weeks earlier that the 1970 Clean Air Act can be both workable and effective for addressing global climate change. Instead, EPA said Friday that law is "ill-suited" for dealing with climate change. "If our nation is truly about serious regulating greenhouse gases, the Clean Air Act is the wrong tool for the job," EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson told reporters. "It is really at the feet of Congress."
Posted by:Fred

#2  #1 They should propose a tax on puddles. Water vapour has far more atmospheric effect than airborne plantfood does. Posted by: Bright Pebbles

Right on, BP. Water vapor and solar activity, PLUS the interaction between the two, account for 90% of all climate, whether it stands still or changes. If I were a betting man, I'd put even money on average global temps taking a 1-2 degree C change over the next five years if the sun remains as quiet as it's been for the last two years. Al Gore would have a hissy-fit I'd pay money to see. Maybe he'll blow a gasket or two, and have to be put out in the pasture - about six feet down. Still, this world is full of gullible people...
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-07-12 23:26  

#1  They should propose a tax on puddles. Water vapour has far more atmospheric effect than airborne plantfood does.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-07-12 09:54  

00:00