You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
India to build ‘clusters’ of Fast Breeder Reactors
2008-06-13
Hyderabad. June 13 India has set plans to build ‘clusters’ of Fast Breeder Reactors (FBRs), which can potentially produce electricity in multiples compared to existing reactors, in the not too distant future.

With the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) expected to produce nuclear power from 2010-11, the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) is working on setting up a series of FBRs, said its Secretary, Dr Anil Kakodkar.

Unlike the existing Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs), which are the workhorse of the country’s ongoing nuclear power programme and use uranium as fuel, the FBRs burn up ‘plutonium’, and that too in very small quantities, to produce clean electricity.

Plutonium is retrieved from the spent uranium fuel burnt in the PHWRs. In contrast to the large quantity of uranium required to run the PHWRs, FBRs need small amounts of plutonium.

The power produced is in multiples, which is the big advantage that FBRs offer. The DAE has already lined up at least four FBRs to be constructed by 2020. The department has set a target of creating an installed capacity of 20,000 MW of nuclear power by then, Dr Kakodkar told Business Line here.

The share of PHWRs by 2020 is expected to be over 10,000 MW. In addition to the existing 4,000 MW installed capacity, at least eight units of the 700-MW PHWRs are in the pipeline. The balance would be made up of over 2,000 MW from the light water reactors at Kudangulam being set up with Russian help, the enriched uranium plants at Tarapur, FBRs etc.

Much of the expansion in the FBR programme would, however, depend on the experience of the PFBR, both in terms of performance and commercial terms, once it is operational in 2010-11, Dr Kakodkar said. DAE scientists have developed a mixed oxide fuel for the PFBR.

While the costs of construction of the FBR are more or less similar to the PHWR, the DAE strategy would be to construct the former in twins or large clusters which will build economy of scale and save on time, he said.

India had demonstrated its research capability to build FBRs nearly two decades ago. It is among the six nations — the US, the UK, France, Japan and Russia — which have the capability and have built such fast reactors.

With limitations of availability of high grade uranium and opening up of new mines as well as import restrictions, efforts to accelerate the FBR programme is under way at the DAE.
Posted by:john frum

#6  It is not quite as simple as it may seem. Even fast breeder reactors need to use reprocessed fuel and the reprocessing is dangerous. Parking the spent fuel for a hundred years or so, prior to repossessing is a nice safety feature. Like Arabian oil, there is a lot of Uranium. Let's use it up prior to doing dangerous things.
Posted by: rammer   2008-06-13 22:11  

#5  We need to build bunches of these, enouhg to supply a large percentage of the base load.

Why is Congress sitting on its ass again?


Oh its DEMOCRAT party stonewalling.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-06-13 20:29  

#4  "They'll need to import reactor grade Plutonium to provide the initial charge for all those clusters."

No they won't. They can process spent fuel rods from existing light water reactors to obtain it. This means that India will never have a problem with nuclear waste disposal because a "combined" cycle of having a fast breeder with a conventional light water reactor means that the 90% of the spent fuel can be recycled and that which remains will decay to background radiation levels in only 300 years or less instead of tens of thousands of years.

We had a similar program just starting but the Clinton/Gore administration killed it.
Posted by: crosspatch   2008-06-13 18:48  

#3  The candidate who proposed the poison pill "Obama Amendment" to the India-US Nuclear (Henry Hyde) Act?
Posted by: john frum   2008-06-13 17:43  

#2  first candidate to propose a bunch of these here as the alternative to Yucca Mtn gets my vote.

(three guesses which one would sooner die than do that, and first two don't count)
Posted by: Querent   2008-06-13 17:41  

#1  They'll need to import reactor grade Plutonium to provide the initial charge for all those clusters.

The 500 MWe Indian PFBR is loaded with two tons of Plutonium. Its breeder blankets are loaded with Thorium (to produce U233) and Uranium 238 (to produce Pu239)
Posted by: john frum   2008-06-13 16:44  

00:00