You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Up in the Sky, An Unblinking Eye: The UAV Revolution
2008-06-08
The whole art of war consists of getting at what is on the other side of the hill," said the Duke of Wellington, conqueror of Napoleon at Waterloo. In the murky kind of fight that marks modern warfare against terrorists and guerrillas, knowing what's on the other side of the hill—or inside a building—takes on a whole new urgency and meaning. Lt. Col. Scott Williams, who leads a unit of Apache helicopters in Baghdad, is in the business of "servicing" targets, by which he means anything from blowing up a building with a Hellfire missile to helping local police make arrests. He must know when to shoot—and when not to.

Williams recently spoke to a NEWSWEEK reporter after leading an airborne foray into Sadr City, where a drone—a pilotless craft generically known as a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle)—had found a rocket emplacement and transmitted images back to the ground commander. Insurgents had attacked the Green Zone with rockets from the site and retreated into a nearby apartment block. Williams and his fellow Apache pilots swooped in for the kill, but pulled back. The UAV—known as a Shadow—had spotted children going in and out of the building. "We knew the bad guys were there," Williams said. "We saw them walk in and out, we saw them place the [missiles] … We could have serviced that building and we probably could have killed four or five of the guys that were involved in it.

But the decision was made at the command level—because of the women and children who were potentially in that building—not to service the target." Instead, the Apaches took out the rocket-launch site and a few of the men around it.

In the kind of counterinsurgency struggle fought in Iraq and in troubled places around the globe, winning hearts and minds is more important than body counts. There is no technological silver bullet that will help America win these wars. But in the cat-and-mouse game played by insurgents who mix freely with civilians, the ability to loiter over a target, to watch closely with cameras before the bombs begin to fall, is crucial. American forces call this "persistent stare capability" or "the unblinking eye"—and only drones have it.

The UAV is the "smart bomb" of the Iraq War, the latest turn in the unending offense-defense spiral that characterizes the history of warfare. Army units searching and fighting house-to-house are using hundreds of drones, some of them as small as a model airplane (the Raven), to track enemy movements. Patrols regularly use them to scout out the route ahead. Commanders position them over well-traveled roads to keep an eye out for insurgents planting IEDs—a task once performed by soldiers sitting in their Humvees for hours on end. The Army is even working on drones that can detect IEDs by seeing where the earth has been recently disturbed. Army drones alone flew more than 46,450 hours in March.

More at the link. An interesting article on their multi-decade development, and what's next
Posted by:Mizzou Mafia

#3  Post 9-11 and IRAQI FREEDOM I supported a plan to build a massive, integrated GROUND/BUILDING IMAGING SYS utilizing High Energy Towers, ADVANC DIRIGIBLES, Sensor(s)/Tech-carrying modified ground vehix, and of course UAVS. The drawback was that it was prob cheaper in LT to use NUCLEAR ENERGY to power and suppor aspects of this system > VERY POLITICALLY INCORRECT VV GLOBAL WARMING, PEAK OIL, + GREEN/ENVIRON LEFT; + also as per PRO-MUSLIM HUMAN/LIBERTARIAN RIGHTS since it wouod basically transform BAGHDAD and major Cities-Towns into SURVEILLANCE CAMPS. Everybody + everything would be surveyed both visually, by natural/ground motion, infrared, etc,
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-06-08 20:30  

#2  "detect IEDs by seeing where the earth has been recently disturbed"

An old technique from IMINT - differential temporal image analysis (a fancy way of saying: overlay pictures that are N time apart and see whats different, and see what the difference looks like).
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-06-08 13:22  

#1  One of the contributory reasons for the American success on the battlefield of Europe in '43-'44 was the prevalence in the culture of dealing with automotive technology down to about the lowest level unit. Someone grew up with the skills to keep a truck or vehicle in operation. American units were known to 'add' equipment and lift to their property catalog either through 'liberation' or repair of abandoned material.

In a similar vain, the small unmanned vehicles being put out on the battlefield today is accommodated by the American experience with game consoles of the '90s and '00s. There's someone who is already skilled in remote manipulation, hand controls, and, through game simulations, cognitively situationally aware.

You just can't buy that sort of cultural wide capability. If leveraged, it is something the 'other guy' can't compete with.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-06-08 08:44  

00:00