You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Musharraf no longer indispensable: US
2008-06-08
So long, Perv ...
SLAMABAD — The Bush administration has conveyed to political and security leadership of Pakistan that it no longer considers President Pervez Musharraf as indispensable to its interests in the region, but would like his exit to be as smooth as possible, it is reliably learned.

This sharp twist in Washington's thinking, according to knowledgeable sources, stems from a reassessment of the fast changing ground realities on Pakistan's political landscape. The groundswell of popular anger and resentment against Musharraf, voiced through the lawyers and his erstwhile buddies, has become irresistible. It is now evident that Musharraf's position is increasingly becoming untenable and the administration can support him only at the cost of a severe damage to its interest in the region.

Policy planners in the State Department and Pentagon have held this view for quite long since the stunning outcome of the February 18 polls. They were, however, hamstrung by President George W. Bush's stubborn defence of his trusted ally.

"This hurdle has now been removed," says a diplomatic source privy to the fresh signals coming from Washington. It is believed that President Bush, Musharraf's only backer left in Washington, has finally been persuaded to accept the inevitable and be prepared to bid adieu to his beleaguered friend. The administration analysts agree that a qualitative change has already occurred in Pakistan's political landscape in which Musharraf's ability to influence policies and course of events has diminished substantially.

Those who matter in the new dispensation include coalition leadership, with Asif Zardari sitting on top, and the army chief Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani as key factor in decision-making on issues like terrorism. Musharraf is left with no levers to influence either of the two sets of wielders of power in Pakistan. The US president, however, is worried that Musharraf's detractors may humiliate him by dragging him to courts or instituting impeachment process in the Parliament for which requisite numbers are available to the coalition.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  HMMMMMM, IMO sounds like Dubya wants a one or two "final" search campaigns to capture or kill OSAMA BIN LADEN, ZAWI, MULLAH OMAR, etc. before he leaves office [read - HELP MCCAIN + BUSH LEGACY].

Problem > The OSAMA I remember from the Afghan War believed himself to be expendable as per ISLAM'S = RADICAL ISLAM's FINAL VICTORY IN ITS JIHAD + APOCALYPSE. In addition, even iff US efforts did result in getting Osama, there is still OSAMA's COHORTS WHOM ARE ALSO DEDICATED TO THEIR CAUSE, + ALSO STILL HAVE ISLAMIST IRAN + SADR + NASRALLAH, etal. whom are capable of independent action vv NUCLEARIZATION = STRATEGIC WEAPONIZATION.

Lastly, ona separate note, just as the ISLAMIST OWG JIHAD will fail iff Islam/islamism does not achieve PAR OR SUPERIORITY-DOMIN VERSUS NON-ISLAM [e.g. "Divine" Premises], US-LED/CENTRIC OWG-NWO will fail iff the US is unable to induce other world powers to form said USOWG-NWO. THE ANTI-US LEFTS, SECULARISTS, and GLOBALISTS etc. ARE NOT COLLUDING WID RADICAL ISLAMIST MILITANT GROUPS FOR THE SAKE OF POST COLD WAR, "STATUS QUO" INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATISM - they want EXTRA-NATIONAL, REGIONAL, TRANSREGIONAL, GLOBAL, and even EXTRA-GLOBAL? PAN-GOVT.(S) BUREAUCRACIES, REGULATIONS, + WELFARISM FORMALLY ESTABLISHED.

Remember that.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-06-08 20:58  

#1  If the lawyers are all after him maybe he's not all that bad.

Joke - What's the difference between a terrorist and a Pakistani lawyer (psycologist, teacher, general, soldier, intelligence officer, policeman, ice cream vendor, imam, cleric, dentist, etc)?

Posted by: Uleagum Big Foot7393   2008-06-08 13:03  

00:00