You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Deposed Nepal king to move to suburbs
2008-06-05
KATHMANDU - Nepal's deposed king is to move from his main palace in the heart of the capital into a former royal hunting lodge on the edge of Kathmandu, a minister said Wednesday. Ousted monarch Gyanendra officially lost his crown last week when a Maoist-dominated constitutional assembly made Nepal a republic after an overwhelming vote in favour of ending the 240-year-old monarchy.

The assembly also issued a 15-day deadline for Gyanendra to vacate the sprawling Narayanhiti palace, now slated to be turned into a national museum.

"The cabinet meeting on Wednesday decided to provide Nagarjun palace to the ex-king Gyanendra for accommodation for the time being," Nepal's peace minister, Ram Chandra Poudel, told AFP. Nagarjun palace is one of seven royal properties nationalised last year. It is situated in an army-protected forest reserve eight kilometres (five miles) north of the centre of Kathmandu.
Accommodation or prison?
The move is a temporary measure until the king can make other arrangements, Maoist spokesman Krishna Bahadur Mahara said. "He won't be able to stay there for a life-long period. He will have to find another place for himself eventually," he said.

The government is currently auditing property inside the king's main palace which contains national treasures including a crown studded with diamonds and ringed with huge emeralds.

A security review is also under way and the government has agreed to provide the ousted king with police protection. It chose not to use the army to guard the ex-king as it is seen as an institution dominated by pro-royals. "He won't be getting any military security. We will arrange security from the police if he requests it," the Maoist spokesman said.
Makes it easier for them to do a Ekaterinburg-style solution in the near future ...
Posted by:Steve White

#6  If he's smart, he'll move to the suburbs of Geneva. Quickly.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-06-05 16:18  

#5  Hard to pinpoint the real villain in this tragedy, but I don't think it's Gyanendra. I blame Prince CrazyKiller and the greedy Commie-Maoist politicians. Can't you just see the smug bureaucrats squabbling over who gets to wear the King's crown? Hamlet, eat your heart out.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2008-06-05 13:25  

#4  The Crown Prince massacred his family because he couldn't marry the woman he loved, and instead had to marry some relative to keep the royal bloodline pure. Inbred and rotten to the core.
Posted by: gromky   2008-06-05 10:00  

#3  Mom's correct (aren't moms always correct?).

To add to what she said, a portion of the public was never quite convinced that Gyanendra was blameless over the murders, and that also dragged his popularity down.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-06-05 09:26  

#2  No - IIRC, Gyanendra was the brother of the previous monarch, who was killed, along with a good portion of his family by his own son... who went bat-s**t crazy with an automatic weapon during cocktail hour at the Palace.

When the smoke cleared, Gyanedra was about the only one of the family left available to assume the throne, evem though he was not particularly popular, or as popular as his brother had been.
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2008-06-05 07:50  

#1  ....Not that I am advocating an Ekaterinburg Solution, but didn't His Majesty whack most of his own family in the first place?

Mike

Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2008-06-05 05:42  

00:00