Submit your comments on this article | |||||
Home Front: Politix | |||||
DNC host officials short on cash | |||||
2008-05-31 | |||||
![]() Consider starting with a less-expensive venue. Perhaps the Supermax in Virginia. The participants would feel at home and the commute would be short. Millions of dollars behind in raising money and unlikely to meet a fast-approaching final deadline, the Denver committee hosting the Democratic National Convention is considering spending cuts.
"There have been no specific decisions made," host committee spokesman Chris Lopez said. "We're always identifying costs and weighing them against our anticipated revenue." Lopez said the committee is still working to satisfy its full obligation.
With less than 90 days to the convention and no way to stage it elsewhere, the shortfall in funds could mean the Democratic Party's plan to showcase itself in a smaller city will result in making do with less. The development could likewise hurt Denver's desire to showcase itself, both in the civic programs it wants to stage during the convention week and in future bids. "It's never good to not deliver the goods," said Eric Sondermann, a political analyst in Denver.
Also, Denver has fewer corporate headquarters than past host cities, and fewer also than St. Paul, Minn., where the Republicans are holding their convention — and where fundraising is on schedule. "But whether those are accepted as reasonable explanations years down the road when the particulars of 2008 are forgotten and Denver is making an application for some major event, time will tell," Sondermann said.
DNCC spokeswoman Natalie Wyeth declined to discuss the matter but said in a statement, "We are always reviewing our budgets and plans to ensure we are being fiscally responsible and budgeting efficiently and effectively throughout the planning period." The host committee sources didn't specify an amount they wish to cut. But committee officials are $15 million short of the $40 million in cash they are contractually obligated to raise by June 16. The committee also must raise $15 million in donated services, which, if those aren't offered, must be bought. The value of donated services offered to date has not been released. The committee never established an $19.5 million line of credit it agreed to in its contract with the DNCC. Officials had said they didn't think it would be necessary. Now those officials say it would be impossible to establish.
Denver's committee missed its first milestone in June 2007 by $1.5 million but hit its second deadline in December with $15 million. It missed its third deadline March 17 by $5 million, and has raised only $2 million since then. Democratic National Convention fundraising progress JUNE 2007 Goal: $7.5 million Actual: $6 million DECEMBER 2007 Goal: $15 million Actual: $15 million MARCH 2008 Goal: $28 million Actual: $23 million JUNE 16, 2008 Goal: $40.6 million Current: $25 million | |||||
Posted by:gorb |
#8 Call George Soros. He is good for it, and has not shown too much reluctance at shoveling millions their way. BTW, has Al Gorelioni slapped a study on the carbon footprint this festival of love will leave on the planet? What is he gonna do? Plant trees all over Kansas to do penance? Bloody hypocrites. Dems are ideologically driven traitors and leeches. Republicans are just greedy and stupid. What a formula for national leadership. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2008-05-31 18:54 |
#7 Dems here are going to face a fight now that the "Transexual Men in Women's Showers" law has been passed. They dont realize but the galvanized a ton of people who were tired of politics into getting involved with that, across the state. The problem is the Colorado GOP is full of country club types and losers, to the point they havent even fielded valid canididates in a lot of districts where they could be competitive. All due to the Denver people running the party and putting "its his turn next" people from thier country club elite up as candidates. Morons. |
Posted by: OldSpook 2008-05-31 17:30 |
#6 At $13,600 per convention delegate it should be a hell of a party. Free booze and hookers for all. |
Posted by: ed 2008-05-31 17:13 |
#5 Nancy and Harry forgot that earmark too? Well, damn, if they can't be relied upon to use the public trough for their antics what can of phony baloney jobs do they think they're holding down? |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-05-31 17:03 |
#4 Colorado, dude, not Louisiana. |
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman 2008-05-31 15:46 |
#3 What about all that money hidden in freezers??? |
Posted by: anonymous5089 2008-05-31 13:48 |
#2 Time to shake the can at Obama. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2008-05-31 13:48 |
#1 Sounds like the original Coloradans are in charge of the party, and won't pony up for a lot of trash-generating grandstanding. Just as Governor Love turned down the Winter Olympics, the current Colorado Democratic Party isn't wild about staging an event that will burden the City of Denver for years into the future, for no possible gain. I also think the outlook of the Colorado Demoncritic Party is reflected throughout the party's regular, down-to-earth members, that while this should be a Democratic year, the outlook isn't too bright - even if they win. |
Posted by: Old Patriot 2008-05-31 13:41 |