You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Jonah Goldberg: there's less to the McClellan book than they'd like you to believe
2008-05-30
Emphasis added.

Longstanding Bush critics like McClellan’s use of the “P” word because they think it proves they were right all along: that “Bush lied and people died,” as that shopworn refrain goes.

The problem is that’s not quite what McClellan seems to be saying. “I still like and admire George W. Bush,” McClellan writes in his memoirs. “I consider him a fundamentally decent person, and I do not believe he or his White House deliberately or consciously sought to deceive the American people. But he and his advisers confused the propaganda campaign with the high level of candor and honesty so fundamentally needed to build and then sustain public support during a time of war.”

McClellan’s only legitimate beef seems to be his unjust treatment during the Valerie Plame investigation. But that complaint doesn’t sell books or get the sluices of journalistic saliva raging. Use of the word “propaganda” and charges of dishonesty about the war do, which is why he uses them. But McClellan concedes in interviews that even when he was an important cog in the “propaganda machine,” he never witnessed anything that seemed at the time to be deceitful or untrue.

Rather, he says that his views have “evolved.” This is one debate over evolution where intelligent design seems to have the upper hand. The prime mover of McClellan’s evolving views was almost surely his need to move books.

This all bespeaks a level of sophistication few ever credited McClellan with when he stood at the podium looking like a McDonaldÂ’s cashier flummoxed by an order. HeÂ’s hawking books by making people think heÂ’s charging the Bush administration with wholesale dishonesty when heÂ’s not even making that case at the retail level. HeÂ’s claiming the role of insider with behind-the-scenes insights, but he admits it never occurred to him that there was any dishonesty at work until he left the White House and began ruminating on what he could put in his book.

If only heÂ’d been this good at working the press when it was for someoneÂ’s benefit other than his own.
Posted by:Mike

#3  Redeeming yourself with the Georgetown elite? $1,000,000.

Having the MSM blow your book to the NTY Bestsellers? $2,000,000.

Cross-examination under oath by Congress? Priceless.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-05-30 15:36  

#2  McClellan's a pathetic soul.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2008-05-30 15:09  

#1  1. The press inflating comments to bash Bush? $0.03

An author hyping his book? $0.01

The press helping with 2 because it assists with 1? Not-anywhere-near priceless.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-05-30 13:06  

00:00