You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Middle classes losing faith in 'rude' police going for soft targets instead of the criminals
2008-05-30
Same report with similar conclusions could be made in France, too, and perhaps to a greater extent, with possibly a less "nanny State" bias and an added ethnic angle (UK Youths seems to be waaaaaayyyyyyyyy more "indigenous" than France's), with, IMHO, the french Powers-That-Be being deadly afraid of rising tensions and fearful of the "natives".
The middle classes have lost confidence in the police, a stark report has warned. They fear they have been alienated by a service which routinely targets ordinary people rather than serious criminals, simply to fill Government crime quotas. The attitude of some officers has also led to spiralling complaints about neglect of duty and rudeness.

The report from the Civitas think-tank says incidents which would once have been ignored are now treated as crimes - including a case of children chalking a pavement. Its author, respected journalist Harriet Sergeant, says she was also told of a student being arrested, held for five hours and cautioned for keeping a London Underground lift door open with his foot.

The report warns that a generation of young people - the police's favourite soft targets - are being criminalised, putting their future prospects at risk. Some offences being prosecuted are now so minor that senior officers have even begun talks with the U.S. authorities to prevent such a 'criminal record' stopping decent citizens obtaining a visa to cross the Atlantic.

Meanwhile responses to crimes such as burglary are slow and statements given by victims of serious crime are often left lying idle for months, the report warns.

An apparent emphasis on motoring crimes is another negative factor.

Miss Sergeant warns: 'The loss of public confidence is a serious matter. The police cannot police without the backing of society. Without trust and consensus it is very difficult and costly to maintain law and order.'

Her report says: 'Complaints against the police have risen, with much of the increase coming from law-abiding, middle-class, middle-aged and retired people who no longer feel the police are on their side.'

In 2006-7, there were 29,637 complaints - the most since records began 17 years ago. Miss Sergeant said this was due in part to the law-abiding middle-classes becoming upset by the 'rudeness and behaviour' of officers.

The report details how officers are expected to reach a certain number of 'sanction detections' a month by charging, cautioning or fining an 'offender'. Arresting or fining someone for a trifling offence - such as a child stealing a Mars bar - is a good way of hitting the target and pleasing the Home Office. Amazingly, the chocolate theft ranks as highly as catching a killer.

Miss Sergeant says performance-related bonuses of between £10,000 and £15,000 a year for police commanders depend partly on reaching such targets. This leads them to put pressure on frontline officers to make arrests for the most minor misdemeanours.

Officers said at the end of a month, when there was pressure to hit the target for that period, they would pursue young men as the most likely 'offenders'. Offences could include scrawling a name on a bus stop in felt-tip or playing ball games in the street. One officer was so concerned he told his teenage son to be careful at the end of each month.

The pamphlet, parts of which were serialised by the Daily Mail earlier this year, says the police themselves are angry at the way they have to 'make fools of themselves'. There were high levels of 'bitterness and frustration' and the targets were 'bitterly resented'.

One officer told how he was pressed to charge children playing with a tree with 'harassment'. The same offence was used against a drunken student dancing in flowerbeds, who aimed a kick at a flower.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#19  I'm armed. Let me know if you need me.
Posted by: Hellfish   2008-05-30 22:46  

#18  Someone was frighteningly prescient about this 51 years ago...

"Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against. We're after power and we mean it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

('Atlas Shrugged' 1957)
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-30 20:10  

#17  
Hmmm...maybe because the latter has a bunch of gun totting, church going, bitter white people?
Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-05-30 15:08

150 mil with 350 mil standing strong. waiting.waiting.waiting.*wink*
Posted by: Lampedusa Whaitle2779   2008-05-30 19:16  

#16  Because Western Europe didn't use to have those?

Generally, no. Western Euro governments were never too keen about an armed population [think 1848, they got the message]. Now just look at the exception, Switzerland, where everyone keeps their issued weapon and several hundred rounds of ammo at home, as members of the 'militia'. I don't see an overbearing centralized government and most people seem polite if a bit grumpy at times.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-05-30 17:58  

#15  Never mind the theory. Don't I always read comments here about how the (USA) elected/non-elected officialdom couldn't care less that the citizens think?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-05-30 16:54  

#14  Hmmm...maybe because the latter has a bunch of gun totting, church going, bitter white people?

Because Western Europe didn't use to have those?
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-05-30 15:22  

#13  I've lived in some university towns in my day, and this sounds like the same "Let's aggressively enforce the law on those inclined to obey it in the first place, cuz that's just easier" mentality I've witnessed in those places.

Another example of this mindset is the whole "Piss Christ good, Mohammed cartoons bad" attitude shown by the "courageous dissenters" in Western society.
Posted by: charger   2008-05-30 15:20  

#12  I'm always amazed when people here assume that Western Europe is a "special" place, with its "problem" due to its intrinsic flaws and faults, and that the USA, the New Atlantis, are immune to that.

Hmmm...maybe because the latter has a bunch of gun totting, church going, bitter white people?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-05-30 15:08  

#11  Ok, my writing skills need some improvement.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-05-30 14:46  

#10  You really believe that?

I'd say that, to borrow a quote from lotp, the USA are less advanced on the death curve... though Reagan and the conservative revolution from the 50's onward had a tremendous effect, IMHO, that is, to keep the "Culture war" (that is, the relentless forward drive of the Forces of Progress, with the conservatives always on the defensive) going... if there is any success to be expected, it will come from 1) collective individual responses, like homeschooling, switching off one's teevee and never turning it on again, going through the msm veil and nver going bacj,... and 2) the inherent, self destructive, failure of the Forces of Progress, the most evident being their nihilism (abortion, low birthrate).

Otherwise than those two hopes, assuming there is no paradigm shift in either or both continents, I really don't see what is the fundamental difference between the USA and western Europe (not eastern Europe is so far untouched, because there was no need to subvert it, as it was submitted, though communism did take its toll, the countries there are in pre-WWII moral state) is that the "struggle" has been lost in the later, and is being lost in the first.

I'm always amazed when people here assume that Western Europe is a "special" place, with its "problem" due to its intrinsic flaws and faults, and that the USA, the New Atlantis, are immune to that.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-05-30 14:45  

#9  reversed here in the U.S.... and forwarded in Europe

You really believe that?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-05-30 12:51  

#8  Heinlein talks about this in his stories about The Crazy Years. He was convinced that the 1970s and -80s were the beginning of that period, and died before he could see that reversed here in the U.S.... and forwarded in Europe.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-05-30 12:32  

#7  I thought much the same about the police here in the US -- particularly in the big cities -- back during the early 80s. However, it seems to me that the situation has been turned around.
Posted by: PatP   2008-05-30 12:29  

#6  'Complaints against the police have risen, with much of the increase coming from law-abiding, middle-class, middle-aged and retired people who no longer feel the police are on their side.'

The police and the rest of the Establishment now have a new master and he only speaks English when he is too pig ignorant to speak the language his orc scrolls are written in.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-05-30 12:00  

#5  They had that same feeling in Boston back in 1775. Little slow on the uptake there.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-05-30 11:58  

#4  'Complaints against the police have risen, with much of the increase coming from law-abiding, middle-class, middle-aged and retired people who no longer feel the police are on their side.'

Because they aren't.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-05-30 11:46  

#3  The author Jerry Pournelle has described situations like this as "Anarcho-tyranny."
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-05-30 11:40  

#2  This is government inefficiency, a capital crime committed by a government. This and the many things like it ensure that the government will fall.

It is a constant in human history.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-05-30 11:38  

#1  Appeasement, thy name is Dhimitude.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-05-30 09:14  

00:00