You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Global Warming Alert: Obesity contributes to global warming: study
2008-05-16
GENEVA (Reuters) - Obesity contributes to global warming, too.

Obese and overweight people require more fuel to transport them and the food they eat, and the problem will worsen as the population literally swells in size, a team at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine says.

This adds to food shortages and higher energy prices, the school's researchers Phil Edwards and Ian Roberts wrote in the journal Lancet on Friday.

"We are all becoming heavier and it is a global responsibility," Edwards said in a telephone interview. "Obesity is a key part of the big picture."

At least 400 million adults worldwide are obese. The World Health Organization (WHO) projects by 2015, 2.3 billion adults will be overweight and more than 700 million will be obese.

In their model, the researchers pegged 40 percent of the global population as obese with a body mass index of near 30. Many nations are fast approaching or have surpassed this level, Edwards said. BMI is a calculation of height to weight, and the normal range is usually considered to be 18 to 25, with more than 25 considered overweight and above 30 obese.

The researchers found that obese people require 1,680 daily calories to sustain normal energy and another 1,280 calories to maintain daily activities, 18 percent more than someone with a stable BMI. Because thinner people eat less and are more likely to walk than rely on cars, a slimmer population would lower demand for fuel for transportation and for agriculture, Edwards said. This is also important because 20 percent of greenhouse gas emissions stem from agriculture, he added.

The next step is quantifying how much a heavier population is contributing to climate change, higher fuel prices and food shortages, he added.

"Promotion of a normal distribution of BMI would reduce the global demand for, and thus the price of, food," Edwards and Roberts wrote.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#16  ION TOPIX > US TO GIVE 500,000 TONS OF FOOD AID TO NORTH KOREA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-16 21:33  

#15  Jim, rendering Kennedy would run an armored division for a year.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-16 21:06  

#14  OTOH KOMMERSANT > HALF OF RUSSIANS LACK MONEY FOR FOOD + OVER 20 MILLION RUSSIANS LIVE IN POVERTY + FOOD GETS CHEAPER.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-16 19:23  

#13  IMO 2,960 Calories is a MINIMA - Read, STARVATION DIET. The average for active Americans [3+ ea. daily meals]regardless of Gender-Age-Health is 5000 calories, and for MALES is higher.

THIS IS THE FOOD SCIENCE/MGT EQUIVALENT OF ARGUING THAT MAINSTREAM AMERS HAVE TO UNILATER CHANGE THEIR WAY OF LIFE SO THAT THE REST OF THE WORLD WON'T HAVE TO = STARVATION-BASED GLOBAL EQUALISM.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-16 19:10  

#12  6'-2", 275lbs here - I'm willing to arm wrestle these pencil necks for "pink slips", with immediate disposal mandatory?
Posted by: Frank G   2008-05-16 19:02  

#11  Render Fat Teddy for oil, solves two problems at once.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-05-16 14:12  

#10  AzCat - some sort of bizarro "Matrix" style energy source?
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-16 12:07  

#9  So we can infer the government-subsidized liposuction with the waste product being fed into biodiesel plants must be right around the corner.
Posted by: AzCat   2008-05-16 11:44  

#8  Grind up the elitists and feed them to the fat people.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-05-16 10:17  

#7  2 biscuits over 300 Lb here...
and NO Ima not stopping.. Muuahahahaha
Posted by: RD   2008-05-16 10:00  

#6  oops missed the close /em after "20 year old", mods please edit?
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-16 08:53  

#5  So the food nazis are banding with the climate nazis. Figured the elitist "We know better than you whats best for you and will force you to do it" would end up on the same page someday, somehow. Even for them, this is a reach. But it shows you how far these religious fanatics will go to enforce the orthodoxy of AGW, so they can impose governmental controls.

And I agree: BMI is a joke, and at my age I hate it - try talking to life insurance peopel and explaining the following:

Mine is 28.9,, borderline obese.

Yet my bodyfat is well within the normal range for a 20 year old, despite being multiple decades past that age.

So I end up having to get a doctor's note, etc, because some pencil-neck bureaucrat thought this was a good measure of fitness.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-16 08:52  

#4  First thing you do is throw out the damned 1950's BMI chart. It doesn't take into account body type, build, bone structure or the fact that you may have gone to the gym a couple of times in your life.
My brother and I have good genetics for weight lifting and mass building, does that mean at 240 lbs and six feet of height we are obese? If you read the chart it sure as hell says we are.
Try explaining this to an insurance company over the phone, you'll want to tear your hair out two minutes into the conversation.
Posted by: Omeretle Guelph2746   2008-05-16 08:36  

#3  So the Bush food-to-fuel program is raising food prices in order to fight global warming!
Posted by: Glenmore   2008-05-16 08:04  

#2  It wasn't long ago that being fat was considered a sign of prosperity, even wealth. After all, poor people can't afford to buy food or pay for unnecessary transportation. But perhaps the writer means to imply that the added weight will be enough to collapse the surface of the Earth, or cause it to spiral into the sun, or something. I fear I don't have nearly as much scientific knowledge as the researchers at the London School of Hygiene, which must be why I don't immediately comprehend their assumptions and conclusions.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-05-16 08:01  

#1  There are a lot of reasons for people to not be obese, but I'm guessing this isn't near the top of the list.

What could the margin of fuel savings be vs the world's entire energy consumption?

This is definitely the AGW cult jumping the shark.
Posted by: no mo uro   2008-05-16 07:48  

00:00