You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
In big concession, militia agrees to let Iraqi troops into Sadr City
2008-05-10
Even McClatchy is figuring it out.
BAGHDAD — Followers of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr agreed late Friday to allow Iraqi security forces to enter all of Baghdad's Sadr City and to arrest anyone found with heavy weapons in a surprising capitulation that seemed likely to be hailed as a major victory for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki.

In return, Sadr's Mahdi Army supporters won the Iraqi government's agreement not to arrest Mahdi Army members without warrants, unless they were in possession of "medium and heavy weaponry."
Which means in turn that the Sadrists have now agreed to the rule of law. This is a two-fer for Maliki.
The agreement would end six weeks of fighting in the vast Shiite Muslim area that's home to more than 2 million residents and would mark the first time that the area would be under government control since Saddam Hussein was toppled in 2003. It also would be a startling turnaround in fortunes for Maliki, who'd been widely criticized by McClatchy and other NYT clones for picking a fight with Sadr's forces, first in the southern port city of Basra and then in Sadr City.

Members of Maliki's Dawa Party and the powerful Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq met with Sadr officials on Thursday and Friday to come up with a 14-point agreement to end the weeks of fighting, which has hindered the flow of food and water into Sadr City other than by coalition and IA forces. The agreement was then passed to Sadr and Maliki for final approval, said Baha al Araji, a Sadrist legislator.

A government supporter said the Sadrists were brought to the table by the anger of Sadr City residents. On Thursday, the Iraqi military ordered Sadr City residents to evacuate in apparent preparation for a major offensive push. "It is not the government who pressured the Sadrists into entering this agreement," said Ali al Adeeb, a leading member of the Dawa party. "It is the pressure from the people inside Sadr City and from their own people that will make them act more responsibly."
Even better. The people now support the government over Mookie.
Like many things in Iraq, the precise effect of the agreement won't be known immediately. Sadr officials long have claimed that their militia has no heavy weaponry, and Sadr has condemned those with such munitions.

Sadr supporter Araji, however, said the agreement specifically barred American forces from entering Sadr City. "The Iraqi forces, not the American forces, can come into Sadr City and search for weapons," Araji said. "We don't have big weapons, and we want this to stop."
Araji is welcome to try and stop us.
The Mahdi Army, and the Sadr movement in general, has been losing support in the past two months in the face of a government offensive intended to force the militia from its controlling positions in Basra and Sadr City. In Basra, a city known for culture and music, Shiite extremists had taken control in late 2005 and began shutting down music stories and forcing women to cover themselves.
As in Anbar, we were fortunate in the end in our choice of enemies: they made many, many more mistakes, and more grevious mistakes, than we did.
But after initially resisting Maliki's offensive, the Sadrists ceded their areas, and the change in atmosphere has been palpable. An annual poetry festival, al Mirbed, resumed for the first time in three years, with male and female folk dancers performing in public and poets spouting their verses.

The city isn't free of Sadr influences, however, though the Iraqi army seems ready to quell any resurgence. Sadrists resumed prayer services on Friday for the first time since late March, but as the imam spouted anti-government rhetoric, Iraqi soldiers converged on the mosque and the Sadrists fled ran, witnesses said.
Most excellent! Make sure the uppity imans understand just how is in charge.
Iraqi officials, including Adeeb, said that Iran, which U.S. officials have accused of supporting the Shiite militias, was "aware" and "supportive" of the agreement. Adeeb made two trips to Iran to meet with Iranian officials to stem the militia violence in Iraq.
Since Iran can't do much about it right now, given that their boys are the ones getting whacked.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Gromky: then the news coming out of Beirut ought to just make your head explode. The government is being treated as "one side" by its own army. When the military in a country can't be trusted to take the side of the elected government, you know it's end days.

I love how this article manages to describe events as "seem[s] likely to be hailed as a major victory for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki", rather than cowboying up and actually crediting the man with a success.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-05-10 13:49  

#3  Prolly right Gromky,
This is a surprising developement, give the libs some time to digest it and they'll no doubt spin it against Maliki and us.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-05-10 07:22  

#2  Next slant to the news: Maliki faction oppresses poor wittle Sadrists. Mark my words.

Also love how they just talk about it as if Maliki is the leader of some militia, instead of the legitimate, elected leader of Iraq.
Posted by: gromky   2008-05-10 03:03  

#1  Aren't light weapons sufficient for Sadr's goons to terrorize the locals?

And I'd throw in a provision that if good people start mysteriously dying or corners of the agreement start getting cut that the whole thing is off. From my point of view, the idiot imam who was already spouting hate would result in warning number one unless he died of "natural causes" before the Iraqi Army could show up to arrest him the next day.
Posted by: gorb   2008-05-10 02:22  

00:00