You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Pink Slip blizzard forecast for New York Times - Red on Red -Smile!!
2008-04-26
THE WORST OF TIMES
STAFF BRACES FOR LAYOFFS AFTER BUYOUTS FALL SHORT


THE New York Times' news room is bracing for a bloodbath in the next 10 days. The word from inside is that approximately 50 unionized journalists have accepted the buyout proposal, and only another 20 non-union editorial employees have gotten on board.

That means the ax could fall on as many as 30 editorial people in the company's first-ever mass firing of journalists in its 156-year history.

Executive Editor William Keller had said originally that he was looking to cut 100 people from the Times staff in response to the dismal newspaper advertising environment. But then a week ago Assistant Managing Editor William Schmidt issued a memo saying it was almost certain that the company would be forced to make involuntary cuts, and he urged more volunteers to come forward.

The plea apparently fell on deaf ears.

With just 70 people stepping forward for buyouts, it is very likely that 30 newsroom staffers will be forced out in coming days. "We're bracing for it," said one insider with some knowledge of the developments. "There's a lot of anxiety."

With competitive threats looming from The Wall Street Journal, which like The Post is owned by News Corp., sources said the business desk and national desk will be spared and will absorb only token cuts. The Metro desk, headed by Joe Sexton, is headed toward a major reorganization and could absorb the brunt of the involuntary axings.

But, as with all developments inside the Times, things move slow. Tuesday was the deadline for employees choosing to accept buyout packages, which offer three weeks of severance for each year worked. Management and other non-unionized employees were to have accepted their buyout offers by Monday.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#5  ... does my severance include a Pulitzer? I really need that on my resume. My j school prof told me so.
Posted by: Capsu78   2008-04-26 19:11  

#4  Mother F*** you and your times.I pull plugs, not you.
Yours is pulled.
No hire.
Betray the troops,
Treason,
NO JOB Again.

Die NY Times, and Die you sophie, yes you that presented your slant on the news.

DIE NY TIMES and forget you ever worked there.

I WONT.
Posted by: newc   2008-04-26 17:06  

#3  Heh. Don't be silly, OS. These are lib loons we're talking about. If they were honest, their masthead would read something like: "Logic and reason are the Enemies of progress!" It's all about the 'narrative,' and economics be damned.
Posted by: PBMcL   2008-04-26 13:03  

#2  Maybe if the stuck to reporting ALL the News in an objective fashion, and not just the spin they wanted, they'd have credibitliy - and jobs.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-04-26 10:02  

#1  But then a week ago Schmidt ... urged more volunteers to come forward. The plea apparently fell on deaf ears. With just 70 people stepping forward for buyouts, it is very likely that 30 newsroom staffers will be forced out in coming days... as with all evelopments inside the Times, things move slow.

Ah - beautiful. This is exactly the type of illogic and reporting that got the paper into the mess it is in. They tell us that things are moving sooo slow. But 70 out of 100 rushed forward within a week and the whole thing will be done within the next ten days.

It is hard to know whether the reporters actually believe what they are write or if they just think they can make up any ol' analysis and attach it to any set of facts, no matter how detached from reality it sounds.
Posted by: Sninert Black9312   2008-04-26 04:50  

00:00