You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
IAEA head rebukes US and Israel over Syrian N-plant
2008-04-25
The head of the UN nuclear monitoring agency has criticised the US for not giving his organisation intelligence information on an alleged nuclear reactor in Syria. IAEA director general Mohamed ElBaradei also chastised Israel for bombing the site seven months ago, in a statement whose strong language reflected his anger at being kept out of the picture for so long.

The White House broke its silence about the issue on Thursday, just hours after top US legislators - members of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee - were briefed on the alleged reactor which they say was being built by North Korea. US intelligence officials said evidence included dozens of photographs taken from ground level as well as footage of the interior of the building taken by spy satellites after the Israeli strike.

"The director general deplores the fact that this information was not provided to the agency in a timely manner, in accordance with the agency's responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to enable it to verify its veracity and establish the facts," the statement said. Additionally, "the director general views the unilateral use of force by Israel as undermining the due process of verification that is at the heart of the non-proliferation regime," it said.

ElBaradei was briefed by telephone by John Rood, the US under-secretary of state for arms control. Additionally, a senior US official said a US intelligence team was in Vienna to brief IAEA representatives. A senior diplomat linked to the IAEA said ElBaradei had already let his displeasure be known to Rood during the US official's phone call over the delay between the time the information became available to the US and when he was informed of it.
Posted by:ryuge

#12  If we told you, Syria would still have a nuclear reactor, dumas.
Posted by: DK70   2008-04-25 22:10  

#11  Right up there on who they put on the Human Rights Committee. However, if it were a serious organization it would be appalling, but given that it is the UN....
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-25 18:18  

#10  Anybody getting the feeling that putting an ARAB in charge of the IAEA might not have been the best idea in the world?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-04-25 17:51  

#9  Late to the dance, ain't ya pal? So piss off. We are not your intelligence arm, comprendo?
Posted by: mojo   2008-04-25 14:07  

#8  If the IAEA got the information it would be instantly whisked away into Syrian hands where they could do things to forstall an attack or protect their operations.

Unfortunately, the IAEA can't be trusted, unlike the Bush administration, whose actions were extremely practical and effective. I guess it all boils down to a trust issue. The IAEA is working to protect their jobs, and the Bush administration and Israelis are working to protect lives.
Posted by: gorb   2008-04-25 13:29  

#7  Fuck you, Mohamed. If you were doing your job, we wouldn't have to.
Go polish your Nobel Peace Prize...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-04-25 10:26  

#6  Mohamed ElBaradei: "We need to protect our phoney-baloony jobs!"
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-25 10:24  

#5  Hoekstra, ranking Repub on intelligence, was furious re: "White House spin" because the media/public was briefed before Congress, yet he knew it a year ago. Could it be because nothing gets accomplished and that some of those who have "the-need-to-know" cannot be trusted with secrecy?
Posted by: Thealing Borgia6122   2008-04-25 10:13  

#4  Hoekstra, ranking Repub on intelligence, was furious re: "White House spin" because the media/public was briefed before Congress, yet he knew it a year ago. Could it be because nothing gets accomplished and that some of those who have "the-need-to-know" cannot be trusted?
Posted by: Thealing Borgia6122   2008-04-25 10:12  

#3  El-Bastard: just another lying Muzzie chiseler. Sod off, swampy.
Posted by: Thaimble Scourge of the Pixies4707   2008-04-25 09:36  

#2  By unilaterally attacking, it prevented hundreds or thousands of meaningless meetings and entire forests of paperwork, thus depriving vast numbers of functionaries and bureaucrats of their livelihood.

And besides, it prevented North Korea and Syria from moving all those materials to safer, less conspicuous surroundings, where they could work in peace. Terrible. Terrible.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-04-25 08:37  

#1  What a tool.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-04-25 08:02  

00:00