You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
State Department warns of forced service in Iraq
2008-04-16
Sorta reminds me of the 1000+ that abandoned the Iraqi security forces when push came to shove about Tater.
U.S. diplomats may be forced to serve in Iraq next year if enough qualified candidates do not apply for certain jobs, the State Department warned employees Tuesday. A similar threat to call up diplomats last year drew fire among foreign service officers. Many of them objected to being forced to work in a war zone, even though Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Iraq was the department's priority.
It's not 'forced' service. You're assigned to a station. No one will put a gun to your head if you don't want to go, but you won't get to keep your job. You volunteered, remember? You filled out an application, you took the Foreign Service examination, and you accepted the job. Go flip burgers if you don't like your assignment.
A cable to employees, obtained by CNN, said the State Department would soon begin to identify candidates for jobs at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, and other provinces.

"We face a growing challenge of supply and demand in the 2009 staffing cycle," according to the cable.
Try getting rid of the BS and paying the rest.
The cable added that no other open State Department jobs would be filled until the Iraq jobs were filled. It also noted that more than 20 percent of the foreign service's 12,000 officers have already served in Iraq and Afghanistan, considered the two major hardship posts.

In 2007 the issue caused an uproar in the State Department, resulting in a contentious town hall-style meeting in October. One official called the order to serve in Iraq "a potential death sentence." "I just have no respect for the whole process because you've demonstrated a lack of respect for your own colleagues," said foreign service officer Jack Croddy.
I wonder what American military forces would have to say in response to this.
"Thank you for that comment. It's full of inaccuracies, but that's OK," Harry Thomas Jr., director general of the foreign service, shot back.

Others pointed out the risks of such assignments, considering the dangers of a war zone, lack of security and regular rocket attacks on U.S. personnel.

Rice, who did not attend the meeting, tried to calm things by underscoring the State Department's attempts to do "everything that we can to try and protect our diplomats."
Which is why Blackwater is still there.
However, she said, "This is one of the highest priority tasks of the United States, and we're going to meet our obligations."

In the end, the State Department found enough volunteers to fill the needed posts. The latest cable says officials hope the same thing will happen this year.
Posted by:gorb

#10  NO! Not Detroit!
Posted by: Hector   2008-04-16 23:11  

#9  Sometimes in the oil bidness you get told where your paycheck will be sent - you can go with it or not, your choice.
Posted by: Glenmore   2008-04-16 18:44  

#8  Tell them what I get told.
"You can always work for somebody else."
Posted by: tu3031   2008-04-16 16:57  

#7  Is DOS having trouble reaching its re-enlistment goals? Is this information published or do they keep it classified? Does that show that the cookie-pushers do not support their department's policy of craven defeatism and backstabbing?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-04-16 14:59  

#6  All the Vets in the audience that support that agree this is 'indentured servitude' raise your hand.
Didn't think so.

Dear DOS losers: Go F your self!

And to those that go where told: Thank you.
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2008-04-16 14:32  

#5  If Jack Croddy was an officer of the all volunteer military, he'd be courtmartialed. This differs how?
Posted by: Thealing Borgia6122   2008-04-16 10:49  

#4  How harsh and brutal. It's just like indentured servitude. Imagine joining a company and being told where you are going to work. Oh, the humanity! On the bright side, at least they are not being sent to Detroit.
Posted by: SteveS   2008-04-16 09:48  

#3  How many at State retired or resigned last year? How many will this year, especially if no other assignments are filled until Iraq and Afghanistan have been covered? In truth, if Secretary Rice accomplishes nothing more than clearing out the deadwood and those who've gone native in the wrong places, it will be a great service to this country.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-04-16 08:06  

#2  a goodly proportion of State Dept. types deserve a long washboard road trip to Hell and personal session w/ Satan..
Posted by: RD   2008-04-16 04:37  

#1  A cable to employees, obtained by CNN

Such a surprise...
Posted by: Pappy   2008-04-16 01:48  

00:00